These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19104103)

  • 1. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 5 Evaluation of a diagnostic test.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jan; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19104103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ['Gold standard,' not 'golden standard'].
    Kneepkens CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):644-5; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 16610511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Principles of evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Kassai B; Gueyffier F; Rabilloud M
    Rev Prat; 2009 Mar; 59(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 19408883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ['Gold standard', not 'golden standard'].
    Claassen JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Dec; 149(52):2937. PubMed ID: 16402524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
    Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the 'STARD' checklist.
    Selman TJ; Khan KS; Mann CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):575-8. PubMed ID: 15721396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research.
    Ewald B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):798-801. PubMed ID: 16828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2011 Jan; 30(2):200. PubMed ID: 21204125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
    Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regarding the paper 'Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random'.
    Skaik YA
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2568. PubMed ID: 20954220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Formann AK; Böhning D
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Knowing how to read a scientific article. 4. Knowing how to apply a diagnostic test].
    Coggiola M; Bobbio M; Bongioanni S; Demichelis B; Longo M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 25(9):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8529859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Hansell DM; Wells AU
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Aug; 58(8):573-4. PubMed ID: 12887948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing critical limit systems for knowledge optimization.
    Kost GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):616-8. PubMed ID: 8757462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are reporting standards of diagnostic test evaluation unrealistic?
    Lassere M
    J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 20147476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.