These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Benign and malignant cells in effusions: diagnostic value of image DNA cytometry in comparison to cytological analysis. Decker D; Stratmann H; Springer W; Schwering H; Varnai N; Bollmann R Pathol Res Pract; 1998; 194(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 9842638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of DNA flow cytometric analysis of body cavity fluids with conventional cytology. Lima CE; Mizushima Y; Masuda S; Kitagawa M In Vivo; 1994; 8(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 7803718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flow immunocytochemistry of marker expression in cells from body cavity fluids. Krishan A; Ganjei-Azar P; Hamelik R; Sharma D; Reis I; Nadji M Cytometry A; 2010 Feb; 77(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 19899128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures. Spyratos F; Briffod M Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 9195572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of combined image and flow cytometric DNA assessments in human breast cancer: a methodological study based on a routine histopathological material of 2024 excised tumour specimens. Falkmer UG; Hagmar T; Auer G Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Sep; 2(5):297-312. PubMed ID: 2275876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: comparison of flow and image cytometry with clinical follow-up in 93 patients. Dreinhöfer KE; Baldetorp B; Akerman M; Fernö M; Rydholm A; Gustafson P Cytometry; 2002 Feb; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11857594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of cytologic and acridine-orange flow-cytometric detection of malignant cells in human body cavity fluids. Katz RL; Johnson TS; Williamson KD Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1985 Sep; 7(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 4052224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)]. Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DNA ploidy measurement in oral leukoplakia: different results between flow and image cytometry. Brouns ER; Bloemena E; Belien JA; Broeckaert MA; Aartman IH; van der Waal I Oral Oncol; 2012 Jul; 48(7):636-40. PubMed ID: 22342568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Determination, by in situ hybridization on interphasic nucleus, a cytogenetic DNA index; application to breast cancer; comparison of this DNA index to DNA indexes determined by imaging and flow cytometry]. Vago P; Lecart S; Simony J; Lequeux N; Radal M; Bureau JP Morphologie; 2000 Mar; 84(264):41-8. PubMed ID: 10923339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of false DNA aneuploidy and false DNA multiploidy in flow cytometric DNA analysis. Zbieranowski I; Demianiuk C; Bell V; Knape WA; Murray D Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Mar; 5(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 8466851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Correlation of flow and static cytometry; their application to the study of anaplastic lymphomas]. Marcos B; González-Ageitos A; García R; Echezarreta G; Sanz C; García MJ; Rivas C Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb; 43(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 9577179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic value of DNA analysis in effusions by flow cytometry and image analysis. A prospective study on 102 patients as compared with cytologic examination. Rijken A; Dekker A; Taylor S; Hoffman P; Blank M; Krause JR Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jan; 95(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 1987753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy. Evans DA; Thornthwaite JT; Ng AB; Sugarbaker EV Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 6846965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of peritoneal fluids from women with gynecologic diseases. Comparison of cytology and flow cytometry for the detection of malignancy in lavage and ascitic fluids. Finn CB; Ward K; Luesley DM; Dunn JA; Redman CW Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1991 Jun; 13(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1910418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of flow cytometric immunophenotyping and DNA analysis for detection of malignant cells in serosal cavity fluids. Sayed DM; el-Attar MM; Hussein AA Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jul; 37(7):498-504. PubMed ID: 19217060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. DNA image cytometry on sections compared with flow cytometry in human bone metastases. Wohlrab D; Klapperstück T; Holzhausen HJ; Held A; Hein W Oncol Rep; 2005 Oct; 14(4):1005-12. PubMed ID: 16142365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of image analysis with flow cytometry for DNA content analysis in pigmented lesions of the skin. Sangueza OP; Hyder DM; White CR; Pallander J; Perkins M; Remple N; Bakke A Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Feb; 14(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 1558616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]