166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19104934)
1. Comparison of scoring systems for the prediction of outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study.
Kim BJ; Park MK; Kim SJ; Kim ER; Min BH; Son HJ; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Rhee JC; Lee JH
Dig Dis Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(11):2523-9. PubMed ID: 19104934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.
Custódio Lima J; Garcia Montes C; Kibune Nagasako C; Soares Ruppert Reis GF; Meirelles Dos Santos JO; Guerrazzi F; Mesquita MA
Digestion; 2013; 88(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 24335273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Vreeburg EM; Terwee CB; Snel P; Rauws EA; Bartelsman JF; Meulen JH; Tytgat GN
Gut; 1999 Mar; 44(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 10026316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three different risk scoring systems in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Camellini L; Merighi A; Pagnini C; Azzolini F; Guazzetti S; Scarcelli A; Manenti F; Rigo GP
Dig Liver Dis; 2004 Apr; 36(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 15115340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores.
Aktas G; Ustaoglu M; Bakir T; Aslan R; Goren F; Bektas A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 41(6):576-582. PubMed ID: 36571703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Jung DH; Ko BS; Kim YJ; Kim WY
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scores for prediction of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in Chinese patients.
Lu M; Sun G; Huang H; Zhang X; Xu Y; Chen S; Song Y; Li X; Lv B; Ren J; Chen X; Zhang H; Mo C; Wang Y; Yang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(21):e15716. PubMed ID: 31124950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arterial lactate does not predict outcome better than existing risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Stokbro LA; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB; Laursen SB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 53(5):586-591. PubMed ID: 29103333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Yue W; Liu Y; Jiang W; Huang J; Liu J
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Jun; 66(6):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 32583220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
