BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19105990)

  • 1. Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Lagouvardos PE; Fougia AG; Diamantopoulou SA; Polyzois GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 19105990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.
    Dozić A; Kleverlaan CJ; El-Zohairy A; Feilzer AJ; Khashayar G
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17362418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers.
    Sarafianou A; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Goula H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 22385694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interdevice agreement of eight equivalent dental color measurement devices.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Pabst AM; Wentaschek S; Scheller H; Lehmann KM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2309-18. PubMed ID: 25797414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of two color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color.
    Llena C; Lozano E; Amengual J; Forner L
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 22186685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
    Kanawati A; Richards MW
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system.
    Yuan JC; Brewer JD; Monaco EA; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 17692592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing L*a*b* color coordinates for natural teeth shades and corresponding shade tabs using a spectrophotometer.
    Hassel AJ; Doz P; Nitschke I; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 19260432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Color comparison of two shade guides.
    Paravina RD; Powers JM; Fay RM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 11887603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluations of Repeatability and Accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device.
    Knezović D; Zlatarić D; Illeš IŽ; Alajbeg M; Žagar
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2015 Jun; 49(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 27688393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.