229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19106019)
1. Saturation biopsy improves preoperative Gleason scoring of prostate cancer.
Kahl P; Wolf S; Adam A; Heukamp LC; Ellinger J; Vorreuther R; Solleder G; Buettner R
Pathol Res Pract; 2009; 205(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 19106019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of pathological stages before prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: analysis of 12 systematic prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Park EA; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Kim SH; Lee SE; Choe GY
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 17681059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy.
Chargari C; Comperat E; Magné N; Védrine L; Houlgatte A; Egevad L; Camparo P
Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Jun; 207(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 21570778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Gleason scores of prostate needle biopsy specimens and of radical prostatectomy specimens, a comparative study].
Xia T; Dong J; Zhang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 82(23):1604-5. PubMed ID: 12667365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes?
Thong AE; Shikanov S; Katz MH; Gofrit ON; Eggener S; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40. PubMed ID: 18930486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score.
Coogan CL; Latchamsetty KC; Greenfield J; Corman JM; Lynch B; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2005 Aug; 96(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 16042723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.
Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores.
Mian BM; Lehr DJ; Moore CK; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Ross JS; Jennings TA; Nazeer T
Urology; 2006 Feb; 67(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 16461089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
Fine SW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications.
Cookson MS; Fleshner NE; Soloway SM; Fair WR
J Urol; 1997 Feb; 157(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 8996356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostatectomy and biopsies that show more than two different Gleason scores in positive cores.
Park HK; Choe G; Byun SS; Lee HW; Lee SE; Lee E
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16413344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
