229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19106019)
21. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Arora R; Koch MO; Eble JN; Ulbright TM; Li L; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2362-6. PubMed ID: 15160339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PSA velocity is associated with gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen: marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Loeb S; Sutherland DE; D'Amico AV; Roehl KA; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1116-20; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 18571700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists].
Kato T; Nakano M; Uno H; Seike K; Kojima K; Kubota Y; Goto T; Yamamoto N; Ehara H; Kanimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Deguchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 19048927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Side-specific factors associated with extracapsular extension and seminal vesicular invasion in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Sankin A; Tareen B; Lepor H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2009; 12(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 19238170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Sanderson H; Carter HB; Scharfstein DO
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 16040085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Gleason grade and score between preoperative biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostate cancer.
Tomioka S; Nakatsu H; Suzuki N; Murakami S; Matsuzaki O; Shimazaki J
Int J Urol; 2006 May; 13(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 16771725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relationship of cathepsin B and stefin A mRNA localization identifies a potentially aggressive variant of human prostate cancer within a Gleason histologic score.
Sinha AA; Quast BJ; Korkowski JC; Wilson MJ; Reddy PK; Ewing SL; Sloane BF; Gleason DF
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4B):2821-9. PubMed ID: 10652560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Correlation between Gleason score of prostatic biopsies and the one of the radical prostatectomy specimen].
Prost J; Gros N; Bastide C; Bladou F; Serment G; Rossi D
Prog Urol; 2001 Feb; 11(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11296645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Histologic grading of primary prostatic carcinoma--study of Gleason histologic grading].
Uchijima Y; Kusuyama H; Okada K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1987 Aug; 33(8):1193-8. PubMed ID: 3425519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Coard KC; Freeman VL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Sep; 122(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 15362366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Significance of minute focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate needle biopsy.
Samaratunga H; Yaxley J; Kerr K; McClymont K; Duffy D
Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 17826493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gleason histologic grading in prostatic carcinoma. Correlation of 18-gauge core biopsy with prostatectomy.
Spires SE; Cibull ML; Wood DP; Miller S; Spires SM; Banks ER
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Jul; 118(7):705-8. PubMed ID: 8024404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can contemporary transrectal prostate biopsy accurately select candidates for hemi-ablative focal therapy of prostate cancer?
Tareen B; Godoy G; Sankin A; Temkin S; Lepor H; Taneja SS
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 19191784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of multiple biopsy cores on predicting final tumor volume in prostate cancer detected by a single microscopic focus of cancer on biopsy.
Guzzo TJ; Vira M; Hwang WT; D'amico A; Tomaszewski J; Whittington R; Wein AJ; Vanarsdalen K; Malkowicz SB
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 16098364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Combined histoarchitectural and cytological biopsy grading improves grading accuracy in low-grade prostate cancer.
Helpap B; Köllermann J
Int J Urol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 22103602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
