BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19106078)

  • 1. Finding the critical cue: implementation intentions to change one's diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating.
    Adriaanse MA; de Ridder DT; de Wit JB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19106078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When planning is not enough: the self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits.
    Tam L; Bagozzi RP; Spanjol J
    Health Psychol; 2010 May; 29(3):284-292. PubMed ID: 20496982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the 'if' for 'if-then' plans: combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour.
    Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT
    Psychol Health; 2014; 29(12):1476-92. PubMed ID: 25099386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory.
    Elliston KG; Ferguson SG; Schüz B
    Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):854-871. PubMed ID: 28722217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning what not to eat: ironic effects of implementation intentions negating unhealthy habits.
    Adriaanse MA; van Oosten JM; de Ridder DT; de Wit JB; Evers C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 37(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 21177875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The habitual nature of unhealthy snacking: How powerful are habits in adolescence?
    De Vet E; Stok FM; De Wit JB; De Ridder DT
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():182-7. PubMed ID: 26169248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour.
    Evans R; Norman P; Webb TL
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():357-364. PubMed ID: 28522307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crossing two types of implementation intentions with a protection motivation intervention for the reduction of saturated fat intake: a randomized trial.
    Prestwich A; Ayres K; Lawton R
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Nov; 67(10):1550-8. PubMed ID: 18771834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power of habits: unhealthy snacking behaviour is primarily predicted by habit strength.
    Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; Evers C; de Ridder DT
    Br J Health Psychol; 2012 Nov; 17(4):758-70. PubMed ID: 22385098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.
    Schüz B; Schüz N; Ferguson SG
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():149. PubMed ID: 26643690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breaking habits with implementation intentions: a test of underlying processes.
    Adriaanse MA; Gollwitzer PM; De Ridder DT; de Wit JB; Kroese FM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 21317315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure to diet priming images as cues to reduce the influence of unhealthy eating habits.
    Ohtomo S
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():83-92. PubMed ID: 27871945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy.
    Churchill S; Pavey L; Sparks P
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Mar; 11(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 30302915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mind the Gap? An Intensive Longitudinal Study of Between-Person and Within-Person Intention-Behavior Relations.
    Inauen J; Shrout PE; Bolger N; Stadler G; Scholz U
    Ann Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 50(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 26801785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Snacking now or later? Individual differences in following intentions or habits explained by time perspective.
    Onwezen MC; Van 't Riet J; Dagevos H; Sijtsema SJ; Snoek HM
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():144-151. PubMed ID: 27470098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.
    Adriaanse MA; Vinkers CD; De Ridder DT; Hox JJ; De Wit JB
    Appetite; 2011 Feb; 56(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 21056605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Snacks and The City: Unexpected Low Sales of an Easy-Access, Tasty, and Healthy Snack at an Urban Snacking Hotspot.
    Schlinkert C; Gillebaart M; Benjamins J; Poelman MP; de Ridder D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33081280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing and comparing the short-term effects of TPB only and TPB plus implementation intentions interventions on snacking behavior in Iranian adolescent girls: a cluster randomized trial.
    Karimi-Shahanjarini A; Rashidian A; Omidvar N; Majdzadeh R
    Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 23286591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. It's my party and I eat if I want to. Reasons for unhealthy snacking.
    Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT
    Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():20-7. PubMed ID: 25261101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions.
    Gardner B; Corbridge S; McGowan L
    BMC Psychol; 2015; 3(1):8. PubMed ID: 25870763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.