230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19106258)
21. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ability of mammography to reveal nonpalpable breast cancer in women with palpable breast masses.
Rosen EL; Sickles E; Keating D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 9930773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening.
Ernst MF; Voogd AC; Coebergh JW; Roukema JA
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15042665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.
Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Kurek R; Motykie G; Martz CH; Rabbitt S
Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):731-5; discussion 735-6. PubMed ID: 10432082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.
Buseman S; Mouchawar J; Calonge N; Byers T
Cancer; 2003 Jan; 97(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 12518359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A failure analysis of invasive breast cancer: most deaths from disease occur in women not regularly screened.
Webb ML; Cady B; Michaelson JS; Bush DM; Calvillo KZ; Kopans DB; Smith BL
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2839-46. PubMed ID: 24018987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 22358016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The association between the pre-diagnosis mammography screening interval and advanced breast cancer.
Goel A; Littenberg B; Burack RC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 102(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 16927175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the breast cancer risk distribution for women undergoing screening in British Columbia.
Weisstock CR; Rajapakshe R; Bitgood C; McAvoy S; Gordon PB; Coldman AJ; Parker BA; Wilson C
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2013 Oct; 6(10):1084-92. PubMed ID: 23963801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Post screen-detected breast cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia.
Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Kan L; Rousseau E
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Feb; 42(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 9065607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Annual Screening Mammography Associated With Lower Stage Breast Cancer Compared With Biennial Screening.
Moorman SEH; Pujara AC; Sakala MD; Neal CH; Maturen KE; Swartz L; Egloff H; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 33955776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Overdiagnosis in the population-based service screening programme with mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years in Sweden.
Hellquist BN; Duffy SW; Nyström L; Jonsson H
J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 22355181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
