724 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19107070)
1. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry.
Touboul D; Roberts C; Kérautret J; Garra C; Maurice-Tison S; Saubusse E; Colin J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 18361984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Central Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma Patients, Glaucoma Suspects, and a Healthy Population.
Del Buey-Sayas MÁ; Lanchares-Sancho E; Campins-Falcó P; Pinazo-Durán MD; Peris-Martínez C
J Clin Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34203884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Billingsley SC; Patel AD; Halverson KD; Alldredge BR; Qualls C
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 18521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
Zimmermann M; Pitz S; Schmidtmann I; Pfeiffer N; Wasielica-Poslednik J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169438. PubMed ID: 28068365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
