These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19107262)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde with calcium hydroxide and glutaraldehyde with zinc oxide eugenol in pulpotomy of primary molars.
    Shumayrikh NM; Adenubi JO
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Dec; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 10825836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of a calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine paste as intracanal dressing in human primary teeth with necrotic pulp against Porphyromonas gingivalis and Enterococcus faecalis.
    Gondim JO; Avaca-Crusca JS; Valentini SR; Zanelli CF; Spolidorio DM; Giro EM
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 22(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 21883559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial.
    Sakai VT; Moretti AB; Oliveira TM; Fornetti AP; Santos CF; Machado MA; Abdo RC
    Br Dent J; 2009 Aug; 207(3):E5; discussion 128-9. PubMed ID: 19629145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A retrospective study of a modified 1-minute formocresol pulpotomy technique part 1: clinical and radiographic findings.
    Kurji ZA; Sigal MJ; Andrews P; Titley K
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 21703062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
    Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pulpal therapy for primary teeth: formocresol vs electrosurgery: a clinical study.
    Rivera N; Reyes E; Mazzaoui S; Morón A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12762614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zurn D; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
    Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth.
    Mani SA; Chawla HS; Tewari A; Goyal A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(2):142-7, 83. PubMed ID: 10826052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Root canal treatment of primary molars with infected pulps using calcium hydroxide as a root canal filling.
    Rosendahl R; Weinert-Grodd A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 7547482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of calcium hydroxide and formocresol pulpotomies performed by dental students.
    Alaçam A; Odabaş ME; Tüzüner T; Sillelioğlu H; Baygin O
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e127-33. PubMed ID: 19836707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies employing calcium hydroxide and trioxide mineral aggregate.
    Percinoto C; de Castro AM; Pinto LM
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 16903198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children.
    Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Nanohydroxyapatite used as a pulpotomy and direct pulp capping agent in primary pig teeth.
    Shayegan A; Atash R; Petein M; Abbeele AV
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 20819402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up.
    Aminabadi NA; Farahani RM; Oskouei SG
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 20831133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial.
    Malekafzali B; Shekarchi F; Asgary S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Sep; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 22077689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evolution and prognosis of necrotic primary teeth after pulpectomy.
    Mendoza AM; Reina JE; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):265-8. PubMed ID: 21207793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MTA pulpotomy as an alternative to root canal treatment in children's permanent teeth in a dental public health setting.
    Alqaderi HE; Al-Mutawa SA; Qudeimat MA
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1390-5. PubMed ID: 24973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.