BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19107384)

  • 1. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.
    Khoo BC; Brown K; Cann C; Zhu K; Henzell S; Low V; Gustafsson S; Price RI; Prince RL
    Osteoporos Int; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1539-45. PubMed ID: 19107384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography.
    Pickhardt PJ; Bodeen G; Brett A; Brown JK; Binkley N
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24880495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of quantitative computed tomography-derived areal bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in an elderly Chinese population.
    Cheng X; Wang L; Wang Q; Ma Y; Su Y; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(8):1445-9. PubMed ID: 24762586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of 3D Geometric Measures Derived From Quantitative Computed Tomography With Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men.
    Borggrefe J; de Buhr T; Shrestha S; Marshall LM; Orwoll E; Peters K; Black DM; Glüer CC;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1550-8. PubMed ID: 26916713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in structural geometrical outcomes at the neck of the proximal femur using two-dimensional DXA-derived projection (APEX) and three-dimensional QCT-derived (BIT QCT) techniques.
    Khoo BC; Brown K; Zhu K; Pollock M; Wilson KE; Price RI; Prince RL
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1393-8. PubMed ID: 21786006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.
    Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of femur stiffness measured from DXA and QCT for assessment of hip fracture risk.
    Luo Y; Yang H
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2019 Mar; 37(2):342-350. PubMed ID: 29671044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
    Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an open-source measurement system to assess the areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur from clinical CT images.
    Uemura K; Otake Y; Takao M; Makino H; Soufi M; Iwasa M; Sugano N; Sato Y
    Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 35038079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
    Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D-DXA Based Finite Element Modelling for Femur Strength Prediction: Evaluation Against QCT.
    Qasim M; López Picazo M; Ruiz Wills C; Noailly J; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Malouf Sierra J; Humbert L
    J Clin Densitom; 2024; 27(2):101471. PubMed ID: 38306806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Winzenrieth R; Tamaki J; Sato Y; Dongmei N; Kajita E; Kouda K; Yura A; Tachiki T; Kamiya K; Kagamimori S
    Osteoporos Int; 2021 Nov; 32(11):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 34041560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distribution of bone density and cortical thickness in the proximal femur and their association with hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a quantitative computed tomography study.
    Yang L; Udall WJ; McCloskey EV; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 23719860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis of low bone mass in CKD-5D patients.
    Blomquist GA; Davenport DL; Mawad HW; Monier-Faugere MC; Malluche HH
    Clin Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 26587778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inverse Correlation at the Hip Between Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Cortical Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography.
    Amstrup AK; Jakobsen NF; Lomholt S; Sikjaer T; Mosekilde L; Rejnmark L
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 25700661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjustment of DXA BMD measurements for anthropometric factors and its impact on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Wang L; Ran L; Zha X; Zhao K; Yang Y; Shuang Q; Liu Y; Hind K; Cheng X; Blake GM
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Oct; 15(1):155. PubMed ID: 33025208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry.
    Luo Y
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jun; 29(6):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 29508039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of femoral neck areal bone mineral density to volumetric bone mineral density, bone size, and femoral strength in men and women.
    Srinivasan B; Kopperdahl DL; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Camp J; Robb RA; Riggs BL; Orwoll ES; Melton LJ; Keaveny TM; Khosla S
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 22057550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunistic Quantitative CT Bone Mineral Density Measurement at the Proximal Femur Using Routine Contrast-Enhanced Scans: Direct Comparison With DXA in 355 Adults.
    Ziemlewicz TJ; Maciejewski A; Binkley N; Brett AD; Brown JK; Pickhardt PJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1835-1840. PubMed ID: 27082831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying misdiagnosis rates from cross-calibration biases and precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the femoral neck.
    Fahrenholtz SJ; Long JR; Whitaker MD; Sensakovic WF
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1623-1634. PubMed ID: 36258271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.