305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19107957)
1. Clinical geneticists in birth defects surveillance and epidemiology research programs: past, present and future roles.
Lin AE; Rasmussen SA; Scheuerle A; Stevenson RE
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jan; 85(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 19107957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network.
Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical resources for assessment of clinical genetics services in public health: current status and future prospects.
Kirby RS
Teratology; 2000; 61(1-2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10603197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
Rasmussen SA; Olney RS; Holmes LB; Lin AE; Keppler-Noreuil KM; Moore CA;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Mar; 67(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 12797461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida.
Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of using the national hospital discharge survey to estimate the prevalence of selected birth defects.
Boulet SL; Correa-Villaseñor A; Hsia J; Atrash H
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 17094134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population and case-control surveillance in the search for environmental causes of birth defects.
Oakley GP
Public Health Rep; 1984; 99(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 6207556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey.
Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA;
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National rates of birth defects among hospitalized newborns.
Bird TM; Hobbs CA; Cleves MA; Tilford JM; Robbins JM
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):762-9. PubMed ID: 17063529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collection, use, and protection of population-based birth defects surveillance data in the united states.
Mai CT; Law DJ; Mason CA; McDowell BD; Meyer RE; Musa D;
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Dec; 79(12):811-4. PubMed ID: 18064713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birth defects interstate data exchange: a battle worth fighting?
Cassell C; Mai C; Rickard R
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):806-10. PubMed ID: 17990342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective coding in birth defects surveillance.
Rasmussen SA; Moore CA
Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 11745837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acardia: epidemiologic findings and literature review from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research.
Botto LD; Feldkamp ML; Amar E; Carey JC; Castilla EE; Clementi M; Cocchi G; de Walle HE; Halliday J; Leoncini E; Li Z; Lowry RB; Marengo LK; Martínez-Frías ML; Merlob P; Morgan M; Muñoz LL; Rissmann A; Ritvanen A; Scarano G; Mastroiacovo P
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2011 Nov; 157C(4):262-73. PubMed ID: 22002952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of DNA sample collection into a multi-site birth defects case-control study.
Rasmussen SA; Lammer EJ; Shaw GM; Finnell RH; McGehee RE; Gallagher M; Romitti PA; Murray JC;
Teratology; 2002 Oct; 66(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 12353214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects--United States, 1999-2001.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2006 Jan; 54(51):1301-5. PubMed ID: 16397457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues raised by incorporation of genetics into the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
Jenkins MM; Rasmussen SA; Moore CA; Honein MA
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2008 Feb; 148C(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 18189287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
Miller E
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
