These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19107957)

  • 21. Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates.
    Hobbs CA; Hopkins SE; Simmons CJ
    Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S8-S13. PubMed ID: 11745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. State birth defects surveillance programs directory.
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC
    Teratology; 2002; 66 Suppl 1():S59-128. PubMed ID: 12239746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Control selection and participation in an ongoing, population-based, case-control study of birth defects: the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
    Cogswell ME; Bitsko RH; Anderka M; Caton AR; Feldkamp ML; Hockett Sherlock SM; Meyer RE; Ramadhani T; Robbins JM; Shaw GM; Mathews TJ; Royle M; Reefhuis J;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 170(8):975-85. PubMed ID: 19736223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
    Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 1982-1985.
    Lynberg MC; Chavez GF; Edmonds LD; Mulinare J
    Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):650-7. PubMed ID: 8115974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system.
    Ryan MA; Pershyn-Kisor MA; Honner WK; Smith TC; Reed RJ; Gray GC
    Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Birth defects surveillance, epidemiology, and public health.
    Kirby RS; Collins JS
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Dec; 91(12):985. PubMed ID: 22125267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Very rare defects: what can we learn?
    Castilla EE; Mastroiacovo P
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2011 Nov; 157C(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 22002945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the quality of surveillance data on congenital heart defects in the metropolitan Atlanta congenital defects program.
    Riehle-Colarusso T; Strickland MJ; Reller MD; Mahle WT; Botto LD; Siffel C; Atkinson M; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):743-53. PubMed ID: 17990334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fostering international collaboration in birth defects research and prevention: a perspective from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research.
    Botto LD; Robert-Gnansia E; Siffel C; Harris J; Borman B; Mastroiacovo P
    Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):774-80. PubMed ID: 16571708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State.
    Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. State birth defects surveillance program directory.
    National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Dec; 76(12):837-93. PubMed ID: 17109399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Random error and undercounting in birth defects surveillance data: implications for inference.
    Correa-Villaseñor A; Satten GA; Rolka H; Langlois P; Devine O
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 14703782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Birth defects registries: a survey of state programs.
    Reed T; Meaney FJ
    Indiana Med; 1988 Mar; 81(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 3351288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years.
    Irgens LM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jun; 79(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 10857866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.
    Duke W; Williams L; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Follow-up survey of parents of children with major birth defects in New York State.
    Sharpe-Stimac M; Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 15368559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program surveillance data, 1988-1991.
    Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):695-709. PubMed ID: 8115977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Letter to the editor: Ventricular septal defects and the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
    Rasmussen SA; Riehle-Colarusso T; Shapira SK; Honein MA; Reefhuis J;
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2011 Jan; 91(1):66. PubMed ID: 21254361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Population and case-control surveillance in the search for environmental causes of birth defects.
    Oakley GP
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 163B():27-32. PubMed ID: 2580315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.