341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19108008)
1. Robotic surgery for cervical cancer.
Magrina JF; Zanagnolo VL
Yonsei Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 19108008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Bandera CA; Magrina JF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
Zakashansky K; Bradley WH; Chuang L; Rahaman J; Dottino P
Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Dec; 76(6):567-76. PubMed ID: 20014423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim YT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 21178577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Yim GW; Kim YT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22123220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Frumovitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18486966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends.
Medlin EE; Kushner DM; Barroilhet L
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):772-81. PubMed ID: 26768315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer.
Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 21860209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Radical Parametrectomy With Upper Vaginectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Occult Cervical Carcinoma After Extrafascial Hysterectomy.
Tran AQ; Sullivan SA; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):757-763. PubMed ID: 28254677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Wolf JK; Brown J; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18639329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique.
Burnett AF; Stone PJ; Duckworth LA; Roman JJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 19835799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
