160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19108355)
1. Response to "Deception and the principle of double effect" by Amnon Goldworth (CQ Vol. 17, No. 4). The role of intention.
Cohen RS; Rhine WD
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(1):101-2; discussion 103. PubMed ID: 19108355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The rule of double effect.
Preston TA
N Engl J Med; 1998 May; 338(19):1389; author reply 1390. PubMed ID: 9575058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment on 'the ethicist's role.
Pinkus RL
Clin Transplant; 1993 Dec; 7(6):565-6. PubMed ID: 11660544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Esprit de corps.
DeRenzo EG; Schwartz J
J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(1):95. PubMed ID: 21595360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental philosophy, clinical intentions, and evaluative judgment.
Jansen LA; Fogel JS; Brubaker M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2013 Apr; 22(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 23507175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The practice of a clinical ethics consultant.
Dudzinski DM
Public Aff Q; 2003 Apr; 17(2):121-39. PubMed ID: 14552294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician integrity: why it is inviolable.
Pellegrino ED
Hastings Cent Rep; 2009; Suppl():18-20. PubMed ID: 19891271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Practicing medicine in the real world: challenges to empathy and respect for patients.
Halpern J
J Clin Ethics; 2003; 14(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 15487126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. End-of-life decision-making, the principle of double effect, and the devil's choice: a response to Roger Magnusson.
McCabe H
J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18807796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doctors lying in the trenches.
Scannell K
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 16192215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical ethics consultation and ethics integration in an urban public hospital.
Aulisio MP; Moore J; Blanchard M; Bailey M; Smith D
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(4):371-83. PubMed ID: 19715624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The oral contraceptive pill and the principle of double effect.
Mirkes R
Ethics Med; 2002; 18(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 14700035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deception. ACOG Committee opinion: Committee on Ethics number 87--November 1990.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1992 Jan; 37(1):63-4. PubMed ID: 1346606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Doctrine of double effect should be discarded.
Biegler P
BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7323):1248. PubMed ID: 11758516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Double effect is different from euthanasia.
McIntosh N
BMJ; 2001 Nov; 323(7323):1248-9. PubMed ID: 11758517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician-assisted suicide.
Castro O; Gordeuk VB
Crit Care Med; 2009 Oct; 37(10):2861; author reply 2861. PubMed ID: 19865023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and the double effect principle.
Micallef PJ
Melita Theol; 1973; 25(1-2):68-77. PubMed ID: 12091959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment refusal and medical ethics].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Jul; 1(27):1817. PubMed ID: 16119299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A response to Papanikitas and Papanikitas; Acute ethics: risk assessment and doctrine of double-effect in a referral to on-call urology.
Hawkey M
Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 19463977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute ethics: risk assessment and the Doctrine of Double Effect in a referral to on-call urology.
Papanikitas A; Papanikitas J
Int J Surg; 2009 Jun; 7(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 19401240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
