273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19108727)
1. Ephrin-B2 expression critically influences Nipah virus infection independent of its cytoplasmic tail.
Thiel L; Diederich S; Erbar S; Pfaff D; Augustin HG; Maisner A
Virol J; 2008 Dec; 5():163. PubMed ID: 19108727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selective receptor expression restricts Nipah virus infection of endothelial cells.
Erbar S; Diederich S; Maisner A
Virol J; 2008 Nov; 5():142. PubMed ID: 19036148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutations in the G-H loop region of ephrin-B2 can enhance Nipah virus binding and infection.
Yuan J; Marsh G; Khetawat D; Broder CC; Wang LF; Shi Z
J Gen Virol; 2011 Sep; 92(Pt 9):2142-2152. PubMed ID: 21632558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of henipavirus infection by Nipah virus attachment glycoprotein occurs without cell-surface downregulation of ephrin-B2 or ephrin-B3.
Sawatsky B; Grolla A; Kuzenko N; Weingartl H; Czub M
J Gen Virol; 2007 Feb; 88(Pt 2):582-591. PubMed ID: 17251577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of endocytosis and cathepsin-mediated activation in Nipah virus entry.
Diederich S; Thiel L; Maisner A
Virology; 2008 Jun; 375(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 18342904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Third Helical Domain of the Nipah Virus Fusion Glycoprotein Modulates both Early and Late Steps in the Membrane Fusion Cascade.
Zamora JLR; Ortega V; Johnston GP; Li J; André NM; Monreal IA; Contreras EM; Whittaker GR; Aguilar HC
J Virol; 2020 Sep; 94(19):. PubMed ID: 32669342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Headless Henipaviral Receptor Binding Glycoproteins Reveal Fusion Modulation by the Head/Stalk Interface and Post-receptor Binding Contributions of the Head Domain.
Yeo YY; Buchholz DW; Gamble A; Jager M; Aguilar HC
J Virol; 2021 Sep; 95(20):e0066621. PubMed ID: 34288734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two key residues in ephrinB3 are critical for its use as an alternative receptor for Nipah virus.
Negrete OA; Wolf MC; Aguilar HC; Enterlein S; Wang W; Mühlberger E; Su SV; Bertolotti-Ciarlet A; Flick R; Lee B
PLoS Pathog; 2006 Feb; 2(2):e7. PubMed ID: 16477309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nipah and Hendra Virus Glycoproteins Induce Comparable Homologous but Distinct Heterologous Fusion Phenotypes.
Bradel-Tretheway BG; Zamora JLR; Stone JA; Liu Q; Li J; Aguilar HC
J Virol; 2019 Jul; 93(13):. PubMed ID: 30971473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Research Progress in Enveloped Glycoproteins and the Membrane-fusion Mechanism of Nipah Virus].
Yan D; Wang Z
Bing Du Xue Bao; 2016 May; 32(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 29963835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of African bat henipavirus GH-M74a glycoproteins.
Weis M; Behner L; Hoffmann M; Krüger N; Herrler G; Drosten C; Drexler JF; Dietzel E; Maisner A
J Gen Virol; 2014 Mar; 95(Pt 3):539-548. PubMed ID: 24296468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel receptor-induced activation site in the Nipah virus attachment glycoprotein (G) involved in triggering the fusion glycoprotein (F).
Aguilar HC; Ataman ZA; Aspericueta V; Fang AQ; Stroud M; Negrete OA; Kammerer RA; Lee B
J Biol Chem; 2009 Jan; 284(3):1628-35. PubMed ID: 19019819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structure-guided mutagenesis of Henipavirus receptor-binding proteins reveals molecular determinants of receptor usage and antibody-binding epitopes.
Oguntuyo KY; Haas GD; Azarm KD; Stevens CS; Brambilla L; Kowdle SS; Avanzato VA; Pryce R; Freiberg AN; Bowden TA; Lee B
J Virol; 2024 Mar; 98(3):e0183823. PubMed ID: 38426726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Envelope-receptor interactions in Nipah virus pathobiology.
Lee B
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Apr; 1102(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 17470911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triggering of the newcastle disease virus fusion protein by a chimeric attachment protein that binds to Nipah virus receptors.
Mirza AM; Aguilar HC; Zhu Q; Mahon PJ; Rota PA; Lee B; Iorio RM
J Biol Chem; 2011 May; 286(20):17851-60. PubMed ID: 21460213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EphrinB2 is the entry receptor for Nipah virus, an emergent deadly paramyxovirus.
Negrete OA; Levroney EL; Aguilar HC; Bertolotti-Ciarlet A; Nazarian R; Tajyar S; Lee B
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):401-5. PubMed ID: 16007075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single amino acid changes in the Nipah and Hendra virus attachment glycoproteins distinguish ephrinB2 from ephrinB3 usage.
Negrete OA; Chu D; Aguilar HC; Lee B
J Virol; 2007 Oct; 81(19):10804-14. PubMed ID: 17652392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structural and functional analyses reveal promiscuous and species specific use of ephrin receptors by Cedar virus.
Laing ED; Navaratnarajah CK; Cheliout Da Silva S; Petzing SR; Xu Y; Sterling SL; Marsh GA; Wang LF; Amaya M; Nikolov DB; Cattaneo R; Broder CC; Xu K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Oct; 116(41):20707-20715. PubMed ID: 31548390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unraveling a three-step spatiotemporal mechanism of triggering of receptor-induced Nipah virus fusion and cell entry.
Liu Q; Stone JA; Bradel-Tretheway B; Dabundo J; Benavides Montano JA; Santos-Montanez J; Biering SB; Nicola AV; Iorio RM; Lu X; Aguilar HC
PLoS Pathog; 2013; 9(11):e1003770. PubMed ID: 24278018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient reverse genetics reveals genetic determinants of budding and fusogenic differences between Nipah and Hendra viruses and enables real-time monitoring of viral spread in small animal models of henipavirus infection.
Yun T; Park A; Hill TE; Pernet O; Beaty SM; Juelich TL; Smith JK; Zhang L; Wang YE; Vigant F; Gao J; Wu P; Lee B; Freiberg AN
J Virol; 2015 Jan; 89(2):1242-53. PubMed ID: 25392218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
