These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19109441)

  • 1. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA structure determination.
    Deigan KE; Li TW; Mathews DH; Weeks KM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jan; 106(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19109441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the suitability of free-energy minimization using nearest-neighbor energy parameters for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Doshi KJ; Cannone JJ; Cobaugh CW; Gutell RR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():105. PubMed ID: 15296519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RNA secondary structure prediction based on free energy and phylogenetic analysis.
    Juan V; Wilson C
    J Mol Biol; 1999 Jun; 289(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 10369773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constraining ribosomal RNA conformational space.
    Favaretto P; Bhutkar A; Smith TF
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(16):5106-11. PubMed ID: 16155182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the accuracy of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure predictions.
    Sükösd Z; Swenson MS; Kjems J; Heitsch CE
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Mar; 41(5):2807-16. PubMed ID: 23325843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model-Free RNA Sequence and Structure Alignment Informed by SHAPE Probing Reveals a Conserved Alternate Secondary Structure for 16S rRNA.
    Lavender CA; Lorenz R; Zhang G; Tamayo R; Hofacker IL; Weeks KM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004126. PubMed ID: 25992778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction and analysis of base-paired regions of the 16S rRNA in the 30S ribosomal subunit determined by constraint satisfaction molecular modelling.
    Dolan MA; Babin P; Wollenzien P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2001; 19(6):495-513. PubMed ID: 11552678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Well-determined" regions in RNA secondary structure prediction: analysis of small subunit ribosomal RNA.
    Zuker M; Jacobson AB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1995 Jul; 23(14):2791-8. PubMed ID: 7544463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three dimensional model for the 16S ribosomal RNA in the Escherichia coli ribosome.
    Minchew P; Joy S; Bhangu R; Wollenzien P
    Nucleic Acids Symp Ser; 1995; (33):68-9. PubMed ID: 8643402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 16S rRNA binding site of Thermus thermophilus ribosomal protein S15: comparison with Escherichia coli S15, minimum site and structure.
    Serganov AA; Masquida B; Westhof E; Cachia C; Portier C; Garber M; Ehresmann B; Ehresmann C
    RNA; 1996 Nov; 2(11):1124-38. PubMed ID: 8903343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary Algorithm for RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Simulated SHAPE Data.
    Montaseri S; Ganjtabesh M; Zare-Mirakabad F
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166965. PubMed ID: 27893832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of base change mutations within an Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA leader region on rRNA maturation and ribosome formation.
    Schäferkordt J; Wagner R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Aug; 29(16):3394-403. PubMed ID: 11504877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method to predict the consensus secondary structure of a set of unaligned RNA sequences.
    Bouthinon D; Soldano H
    Bioinformatics; 1999 Oct; 15(10):785-98. PubMed ID: 10705432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using reliability information to annotate RNA secondary structures.
    Zuker M; Jacobson AB
    RNA; 1998 Jun; 4(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9622126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of optimal and suboptimal RNA secondary structures predicted by free energy minimization with structures determined by phylogenetic comparison.
    Zuker M; Jaeger JA; Turner DH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1991 May; 19(10):2707-14. PubMed ID: 1710343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Hajiaghayi M; Condon A; Hoos HH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Feb; 13():22. PubMed ID: 22296803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Principles for understanding the accuracy of SHAPE-directed RNA structure modeling.
    Leonard CW; Hajdin CE; Karabiber F; Mathews DH; Favorov OV; Dokholyan NV; Weeks KM
    Biochemistry; 2013 Jan; 52(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 23316814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structure and function of the conserved 690 hairpin in Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA: analysis of the stem nucleotides.
    Morosyuk SV; Lee K; SantaLucia J; Cunningham PR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jun; 300(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 10864503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of alternative RNA secondary structures based on fluctuating thermodynamic parameters.
    Le SY; Chen JH; Maizel JV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1993 May; 21(9):2173-8. PubMed ID: 7684834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs.
    Cannone JJ; Subramanian S; Schnare MN; Collett JR; D'Souza LM; Du Y; Feng B; Lin N; Madabusi LV; Müller KM; Pande N; Shang Z; Yu N; Gutell RR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002; 3():2. PubMed ID: 11869452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.