These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19109853)
1. The impact of interactive, computerized educational modules on preclinical medical education. Bryner BS; Saddawi-Konefka D; Gest TR Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(6):247-51. PubMed ID: 19109853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy. Allen EB; Walls RT; Reilly FD Med Teach; 2008 Feb; 30(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 18278650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format. Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection? Granger NA; Calleson D Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bridging the transfer gap: laboratory exercise combines clinical exposure and anatomy review. Wilson AB; Ross C; Petty M; Williams JM; Thorp LE Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):790-8. PubMed ID: 19659493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical student retention of embryonic development: impact of the dimensions added by multimedia tutorials. Marsh KR; Giffin BF; Lowrie DJ Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(6):252-7. PubMed ID: 19109854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of four supplemental instruction programs on students' learning of gross anatomy. Forester JP; Thomas PP; McWhorter DL Clin Anat; 2004 May; 17(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15108338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of medical student experience using medical student created StudentPACS flash based PACS simulator tutorials for learning radiological topics. Soman S; Amorosa JK; Mueller L; Hu J; Zou L; Masand A; Cheng C; Virk J; Rama H; Tseng I; Patel K; Connolly SE Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):799-807. PubMed ID: 20303802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Shaffer K; Small JE Acad Radiol; 2004 Sep; 11(9):1059-70. PubMed ID: 15350588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted learning module on glomerulonephritis for medical students. Velan GM; Killen MT; Dziegielewski M; Kumar RK Med Teach; 2002 Jul; 24(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 12193326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a low-cost web-based simulation to improve students' practical skills in medical education. Moreno-Ger P; Torrente J; Bustamante J; Fernández-Galaz C; Fernández-Manjón B; Comas-Rengifo MD Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 20347383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Students can learn medicine with computers. Evaluation of an interactive computer learning package in geriatric medicine. Andrews PV; Schwarz J; Helme RD Med J Aust; 1992 Nov; 157(10):693-5. PubMed ID: 1435413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students. Nousiainen M; Brydges R; Backstein D; Dubrowski A Surgery; 2008 Apr; 143(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 18374052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images. Khalil MK; Paas F; Johnson TE; Su YK; Payer AF Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19177385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using computer-based interactive imagery strategies for designing instructional anatomy programs. Khalil MK; Lamar CH; Johnson TE Clin Anat; 2005 Jan; 18(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15597366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IVIMEDS: a short report on an evaluation of the cardiovascular system learning module. Régo P; Ozolins I Med Teach; 2007 Nov; 29(9):961-5. PubMed ID: 18158672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning? Hudson JN Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 15271050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes of health care students about computer-aided neuroanatomy instruction. McKeough DM; Bagatell N J Allied Health; 2009; 38(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 20011816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of the role of self-study and group discussion. Holla SJ; Selvaraj KG; Isaac B; Chandi G Clin Anat; 1999; 12(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 10398388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Petersson H; Sinkvist D; Wang C; Smedby O Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 19363804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]