BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19110084)

  • 1. Diagnosis of atherosclerosis by imaging.
    Ibañez B; Badimon JJ; Garcia MJ
    Am J Med; 2009 Jan; 122(1 Suppl):S15-25. PubMed ID: 19110084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease].
    Kiraç S
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging of atherosclerosis.
    Takx RA; Partovi S; Ghoshhajra BB
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 26239134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of noncalcified and mixed plaque by multirow detector computed tomography.
    Foster G; Shah H; Sarraf G; Ahmadi N; Budoff M
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2009 Jan; 7(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 19105767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the heart: CT and MRI for coronary heart disease.
    Sirineni GK; Stillman AE
    J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17325582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The year in coronary artery disease.
    Achenbach S; Kramer CM; Zoghbi WA; Dilsizian V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1065-77. PubMed ID: 20947052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The role of noninvasive methods of investigation in diagnosis of atherosclerosis].
    Belenkov IuN; Sergienko VB
    Kardiologiia; 2007; 47(10):37-44. PubMed ID: 18260942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated non-invasive imaging techniques.
    Prati F; Mallus MT; Broglia L; Albertucci M
    EuroIntervention; 2010 May; 6 Suppl G():G161-8. PubMed ID: 20542824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What are the most useful and trustworthy noninvasive anatomic markers of existing vascular disease?
    Chow BJ; Veinot JP
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2006 Nov; 8(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 17059796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging of vulnerable coronary artery plaques.
    Hamdan A; Assali A; Fuchs S; Battler A; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jul; 70(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17585387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed tomography for atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease imaging.
    Raggi P; Achenbach S
    Discov Med; 2010 Feb; 9(45):98-104. PubMed ID: 20193634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiovascular imaging: new directions in an evolving landscape.
    Dwivedi G; Chan KL; Friedrich MG; Beanlands RS
    Can J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 29(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 23439017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment.
    Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Hachamovitch R; Friedman JD; Polk DM; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Germano G; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Jan; 37(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 17161035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multimodality imaging of atherosclerosis (magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography/positron emission tomography-computed tomography).
    Rudd JH; Myers KS; Sanz J; Fayad ZA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 18(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 18025992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current and future trends in multimodality imaging of coronary artery disease.
    Alexanderson-Rosas E; Guinto-Nishimura GY; Cruz-Mendoza JR; Oropeza-Aguilar M; De La Fuente-Mancera JC; Barrero-Mier AF; Monroy-Gonzalez A; Juarez-Orozco LE; Cano-Zarate R; Meave-Gonzalez A
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Jun; 13(6):715-31. PubMed ID: 25912725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of hyperintense plaque with noncontrast T(1)-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance coronary plaque imaging: comparison with multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawasaki T; Koga S; Koga N; Noguchi T; Tanaka H; Koga H; Serikawa T; Orita Y; Ikeda S; Mito T; Goto Y; Shintani Y; Tanaka A; Fukuyama T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jun; 2(6):720-8. PubMed ID: 19520342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: going toward an integrated imaging approach.
    Petretta M; Costanzo P; Acampa W; Imbriaco M; Ferro A; Filardi PP; Cuocolo A
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Oct; 9(10):977-86. PubMed ID: 18799959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of the vulnerable plaque: new modalities.
    Bhatia V; Bhatia R; Dhindsa S; Dhindsa M
    South Med J; 2003 Nov; 96(11):1142-7. PubMed ID: 14632365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive prediction of coronary atherosclerosis by quantification of coronary artery calcification using electron beam computed tomography: comparison with electrocardiographic and thallium exercise stress test results.
    Kajinami K; Seki H; Takekoshi N; Mabuchi H
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 26(5):1209-21. PubMed ID: 7594034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.