BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19110225)

  • 1. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery.
    Clark SL; Miller DD; Belfort MA; Dildy GA; Frye DK; Meyers JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 200(2):156.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19110225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
    Wigton TR; Wolk BM
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
    Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress.
    Yee W; Amin H; Wood S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 111(4):823-8. PubMed ID: 18378740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery.
    De Luca R; Boulvain M; Irion O; Berner M; Pfister RE
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123(6):e1064-71. PubMed ID: 19482739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes.
    Alanis MC; Robinson CJ; Hulsey TC; Ebeling M; Johnson DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):262.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18771976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
    Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication.
    Dublin S; Lydon-Rochelle M; Kaplan RC; Watts DH; Critchlow CW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 11035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration of labor induction in nulliparous women at term: how long is long enough?
    Blackwell SC; Refuerzo J; Chadha R; Samson J
    Am J Perinatol; 2008 Apr; 25(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 18548392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
    Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 211(3):249.e1-249.e16. PubMed ID: 24631440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.