BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19110370)

  • 1. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
    Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability.
    Lai CY; Wu CH; Chen CC; Li PC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 17169705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake.
    Karshafian R; Samac S; Bevan PD; Burns PN
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):691-7. PubMed ID: 20153497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation.
    van Wamel A; Kooiman K; Harteveld M; Emmer M; ten Cate FJ; Versluis M; de Jong N
    J Control Release; 2006 May; 112(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16556469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro.
    Qiu Y; Luo Y; Zhang Y; Cui W; Zhang D; Wu J; Zhang J; Tu J
    J Control Release; 2010 Jul; 145(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20398711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation.
    Yang F; Gu N; Chen D; Xi X; Zhang D; Li Y; Wu J
    J Control Release; 2008 Nov; 131(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 18727944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of cell membrane response to ultrasound activated microbubbles.
    Tran TA; Le Guennec JY; Bougnoux P; Tranquart F; Bouakaz A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18334312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
    Yeh CK; Su SY
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound exposure can increase the membrane permeability of human neutrophil granulocytes containing microbubbles without causing complete cell destruction.
    Korosoglou G; Hardt SE; Bekeredjian R; Jenne J; Konstantin M; Hagenmueller M; Katus HA; Kuecherer H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 16464675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbubble-induced sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection in vitro at low acoustic pressures.
    Qiu Y; Zhang C; Tu J; Zhang D
    J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 22498312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro.
    Rahim A; Taylor SL; Bush NL; ter Haar GR; Bamber JC; Porter CD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1269-79. PubMed ID: 16875960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of transcranial ultrasound and intravenous microbubbles on blood brain barrier permeability in a large animal model.
    Xie F; Boska MD; Lof J; Uberti MG; Tsutsui JM; Porter TR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2028-34. PubMed ID: 18692294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of sonoporation effect of liposomes and phospholipids-based microbubbles on cultured cell membrane].
    Zhao YZ; Luo YK; Tang J; Zhang Y; Lin Q; Mei XG
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2006 Dec; 41(12):1176-9. PubMed ID: 17290616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancement of microbubble mediated gene delivery by simultaneous exposure to ultrasonic and magnetic fields.
    Stride E; Porter C; Prieto AG; Pankhurst Q
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):861-8. PubMed ID: 19282096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound.
    Tu J; Matula TJ; Brayman AA; Crum LA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 32(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 16464673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonoporation-induced depolarization of plasma membrane potential: analysis of heterogeneous impact.
    Qin P; Xu L; Hu Y; Zhong W; Cai P; Du L; Jin L; Yu AC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 May; 40(5):979-89. PubMed ID: 24462155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radionuclide tumour therapy with ultrasound contrast microbubbles.
    van Wamel A; Bouakaz A; Bernard B; ten Cate F; de Jong N
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):903-6. PubMed ID: 15047404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation.
    Hu Y; Wan JM; Yu AC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2393-405. PubMed ID: 24063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Optimization of acoustic parameters of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound sonoporation for augmenting tumor cell permeability in vivo].
    Luo L; Wu F; Wang B; Xu T; Hu J; Sui Y
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1377-81. PubMed ID: 24067224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.