These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19110834)

  • 1. Human factors of the confirmation bias in intelligence analysis: decision support from graphical evidence landscapes.
    Cook MB; Smallman HS
    Hum Factors; 2008 Oct; 50(5):745-54. PubMed ID: 19110834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making.
    Cardoso RL; Leite RO; de Aquino AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160443. PubMed ID: 27508519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the psychology of intelligence analysis: from rational actors to adaptive thinkers.
    Puvathingal BJ; Hantula DA
    Am Psychol; 2012 Apr; 67(3):199-210. PubMed ID: 22201244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing confirmation bias in clinical decision-making.
    Eli I
    J Dent Educ; 1996 Oct; 60(10):831-5. PubMed ID: 8892508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Debiasing Training Improves Decision Making in the Field.
    Sellier AL; Scopelliti I; Morewedge CK
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1371-1379. PubMed ID: 31347444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cognitive prosthesis for complex decision-making.
    Tremblay S; Gagnon JF; Lafond D; Hodgetts HM; Doiron M; Jeuniaux PPJMH
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():349-360. PubMed ID: 27633232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust in deliberation: The consequences of deliberative decision strategies for medical decisions.
    Scherer LD; de Vries M; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Fagerlin A
    Health Psychol; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1090-9. PubMed ID: 25844905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.
    Rowley HV; Peters GM; Lundie S; Moore SJ
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():24-33. PubMed ID: 22813856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In and out of home care decisions: The influence of confirmation bias in developing decision supportive reasoning.
    Spratt T; Devaney J; Hayes D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():76-85. PubMed ID: 25687965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation.
    Dhami MK; Belton IK; De Werd P; Hadzhieva V; Wicke L
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 38866984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating industrial investigation: examining the impact of a priori knowledge and tunnel vision education.
    Maclean CL; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):441-53. PubMed ID: 24295062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical versus graphical aids for decision-making in a multi-cue signal identification task.
    Szulc J; Fletcher K
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jul; 118():104260. PubMed ID: 38417229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biased information search in homogeneous groups: confidence as a moderator for the effect of anticipated task requirements.
    Kerschreiter R; Schulz-Hardt S; Mojzisch A; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):679-91. PubMed ID: 18310314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making.
    Almashat S; Ayotte B; Edelstein B; Margrett J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Apr; 71(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis.
    Montibeller G; von Winterfeldt D
    Risk Anal; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1230-51. PubMed ID: 25873355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the neurological substrate of emotional and social intelligence.
    Bar-On R; Tranel D; Denburg NL; Bechara A
    Brain; 2003 Aug; 126(Pt 8):1790-800. PubMed ID: 12805102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a Model of Analysts' Judgments to Augment an Item Calibration Process.
    Hauser C; Thum YM; He W; Ma L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):826-849. PubMed ID: 29795843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical meta-analysis of lens model studies in human judgment and decision-making.
    Kaufmann E; Reips UD; Wittmann WW
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83528. PubMed ID: 24391781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.