These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19110939)
21. Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors. Kwok KW; Leung KM; Lui GS; Chu SV; Lam PK; Morritt D; Maltby L; Brock TC; Van den Brink PJ; Warne MS; Crane M Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 17283595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterizing the noncancer toxicity of mixtures using concepts from the TTC and quantitative models of uncertainty in mixture toxicity. Price PS; Hollnagel HM; Zabik JM Risk Anal; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1534-48. PubMed ID: 19886945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survey of methodologies for developing media screening values for ecological risk assessment. Barron MG; Wharton SR Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Nov; 1(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 16639899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Critical evaluation of the sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Beckert DS; Ginn TC Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):156-70. PubMed ID: 17994918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ecological risk assessment for aquatic species exposed to contaminants in Keelung River, Taiwan. Chen CS Chemosphere; 2005 Dec; 61(8):1142-58. PubMed ID: 16263384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China. Feng CL; Wu FC; Dyer SD; Chang H; Zhao XL Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):1177-83. PubMed ID: 23058200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal. Van Sprang PA; Verdonck FA; Van Assche F; Regoli L; De Schamphelaere KA Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(20):5373-91. PubMed ID: 19631966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The toxicity of molybdate to freshwater and marine organisms. II. Effects assessment of molybdate in the aquatic environment under REACH. Heijerick DG; Regoli L; Carey S Sci Total Environ; 2012 Oct; 435-436():179-87. PubMed ID: 22854089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application of QSARs in risk management of existing chemicals. Verhaar HJ; van Leeuwen CJ; Bol J; Hermens JL SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):39-58. PubMed ID: 8790639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Using field data and weight of evidence to develop water quality criteria. Cormier SM; Paul JF; Spehar RL; Shaw-Allen P; Berry WJ; Suter GW Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Oct; 4(4):490-504. PubMed ID: 18630992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing metal bioaccumulation in aquatic environments: the inverse relationship between bioaccumulation factors, trophic transfer factors and exposure concentration. DeForest DK; Brix KV; Adams WJ Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 17673306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of aquatic ecological risk and site-specific criteria of copper in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Arnold WR; Warren-Hicks WJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Jan; 3(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 17283594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part I. Acute toxicity of five chemicals. Dwyer FJ; Mayer FL; Sappington LC; Buckler DR; Bridges CM; Greer IE; Hardesty DK; Henke CE; Ingersoll CG; Kunz JL; Whites DW; Augspurger T; Mount DR; Hattala K; Neuderfer GN Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 48(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15772881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Health risk assessment of drinking water contaminants in Canada: the applicability of mixture risk assessment methods. Krishnan K; Paterson J; Williams DT Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 9356281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. von der Ohe PC; Dulio V; Slobodnik J; De Deckere E; Kühne R; Ebert RU; Ginebreda A; De Cooman W; Schüürmann G; Brack W Sci Total Environ; 2011 May; 409(11):2064-77. PubMed ID: 21414651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water. Ritter L; Totman C; Krishnan K; Carrier R; Vézina A; Morisset V J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2007 Oct; 10(7):527-57. PubMed ID: 17934949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A review of the tissue residue approach for organic and organometallic compounds in aquatic organisms. McElroy AE; Barron MG; Beckvar N; Driscoll SB; Meador JP; Parkerton TF; Preuss TG; Steevens JA Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jan; 7(1):50-74. PubMed ID: 21184569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of quantitative structure--activity relationships for assessing the aquatic toxicity of phthalate esters. Parkerton TF; Konkel WJ Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 Jan; 45(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 10677269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]