918 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19112837)
1. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of comparison between different kinds of alaryngeal speech in laryngectomized patients with euphonic speech].
Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Moskal D; Rutkowski R; Falkowski D
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2010 Apr; 28(166):277-83. PubMed ID: 20491337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with voice prostheses. Results of a prospective follow-up study].
de Maddalena H; Maassen M; Arold R; Ptok M; Zenner HP
Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Aug; 71(8):416-22. PubMed ID: 1388467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Results of rehabilitation of voice and speeches after implantation of valve vocal prosthesis at ill after total removal of larynx].
Ratajczak J; Wojdas A; Jurkiewicz D
Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 19205520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Acoustic analysis of the voice restored by using a tracheoesophageal slit-like fistula].
Jin GW; Yang CH; Xu KX; Xu ZR; Li SC; Chen J; Zhang JX; Zhang ZL
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 14515786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
Kischk BT; Gross M
HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Voice prostheses or esophageal replacement voice?].
Daniilidis I; Nikolaou A; Markou C; Kotsani A
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Feb; 77(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9555702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Speech intelligibility and psychosocial adaptation in various voice rehabilitation methods following laryngectomy].
de Maddalena H; Pfrang H; Schohe R; Zenner HP
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Oct; 70(10):562-7. PubMed ID: 1741886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Groningen prosthesis.
Manni JJ; van den Broek P; de Groot MA; Berends E
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 6544851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acoustic voice analysis in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy].
Rosique M; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes J
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10217687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis of pneumatic artificial larynx.
Xu JJ; Chen X; Lu MP; Qiao MZ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19932853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conversion from a non-indwelling to a Provox2 indwelling voice prosthesis for speech rehabilitation: comparison of voice quality and patient preference.
Vlantis AC; Gregor RT; Elliot H; Oudes M
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Oct; 117(10):815-20. PubMed ID: 14653926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech.
Op de Coul BM; Ackerstaff AH; van As-Brooks CJ; van den Hoogen FJ; Meeuwis CA; Manni JJ; Hilgers FJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 16076712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Subjective and objective voice assessment following partial resection of the larynx].
Ptok M; de Maddalena H
Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jul; 69(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 2244949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative acoustic analysis of voice production by near-total laryngectomy and normal laryngeal speakers.
Hoasjoe DK; Martin GF; Doyle PC; Wong FS
J Otolaryngol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 1564748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.
D'Alatri L; Bussu F; Scarano E; Paludetti G; Marchese MR
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 22209062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox voice prosthesis in South Africa.
Cornu AS; Vlantis AC; Elliott H; Gregor RT
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Jan; 117(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 12590857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
