186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19112855)
21. Optic nerve diffusion changes and atrophy jointly predict visual dysfunction after optic neuritis.
Kolbe S; Chapman C; Nguyen T; Bajraszewski C; Johnston L; Kean M; Mitchell P; Paine M; Butzkueven H; Kilpatrick T; Egan G
Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 19162205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Humphrey visual field analysis, visual field defects, and ophthalmic findings in patients with macro pituitary adenoma.
Gedik S; Gur S; Atalay B; Colak M; Altinors N; Akova YA
Saudi Med J; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1380-4. PubMed ID: 17768464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Objective visual field evaluation using multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with intracranial disease complicated by mental disorders.
Yukawa E; Matsuura T; Kim YJ; Nitta N; Taketani F; Hara Y
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2008 Jun; 110(6):592-8. PubMed ID: 18450369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.
Sisto D; Trojano M; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Iliceto G; Sborgia C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1264-8. PubMed ID: 15790888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Axonal loss and myelin in early ON loss in postacute optic neuritis.
Klistorner A; Arvind H; Nguyen T; Garrick R; Paine M; Graham S; O'Day J; Grigg J; Billson F; Yiannikas C
Ann Neurol; 2008 Sep; 64(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 18825673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis.
Pakrou N; Casson R; Kaines A; Selva D
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 16925704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting impairment of central vision from dimensions of the optic chiasm in patients with pituitary adenoma.
Carrim ZI; Reeks GA; Chohan AW; Dunn LT; Hadley DM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2007 Mar; 149(3):255-60; discussion 260. PubMed ID: 17273885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison between multifocal and conventional VEP latency changes secondary to glaucomatous damage.
Grippo TM; Hood DC; Kanadani FN; Ezon I; Greenstein VC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5331-6. PubMed ID: 17122121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Functional assessment of the visual pathway with multifocal visual evoked potentials, and their relationship with disability in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Blanco R; Pérez-Rico C; Puertas-Muñoz I; Ayuso-Peralta L; Boquete L; Arévalo-Serrano J
Mult Scler; 2014 Feb; 20(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23828868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of multifocal visual evoked potentials in patients with Graves' orbitopathy and subclinical optic nerve involvement.
Pérez-Rico C; Rodríguez-González N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Blanco R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 125(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22581376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Central visual field in patients with multiple sclerosis without symptoms of optic neuritis].
Nizankowska MH; Misiuk-Hojło M; Turno-Krecicka A; Ejma M; Chełstowska J
Klin Oczna; 1996 Jan; 98(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9019571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A child with epilepsy in whom multifocal VEPs facilitated the objective measurement of the visual field.
Yukawa E; Kim YJ; Kawasaki K; Taketani F; Hara Y
Epilepsia; 2005 Apr; 46(4):577-9. PubMed ID: 15816954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Diagnostic studies of optic neuritis in children and adolescents].
Bernardczyk-Meller J; Galas-Zgorzalewicz B; Gradzki J; Meller M; Paprzycki W; Toczko A; Załecki K; Zgorzalewicz M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 9379653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of tendency-oriented perimetry and dynamic strategy in octopus perimetry as a screening tool in a clinical setting: a prospective study.
Scherrer M; Fleischhauer JC; Helbig H; Johann Auf der Heide K; Sutter FK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 17458786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in optic nerve diseases.
Atilla H; Tekeli O; Ornek K; Batioglu F; Elhan AH; Eryilmaz T
J Clin Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 13(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 16410198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration].
Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Differential diagnosis in visual field defects of glaucoma patients].
Brunotte I; Haubitz B; Winter R; Meyer MW
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Feb; 225(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 18293271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multifocal and pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials vs. automated perimetry frequency-doubling technology matrix in optic neuritis.
Nebbioso M; Steigerwalt RD; Pecori-Giraldi J; Vingolo EM
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 61(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 23412522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Adenoma of the pituitary gland in the ophthalmologist's out-patient practice].
Kochánová I; Stasek A; Kubena T
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Sep; 60(5):348-55. PubMed ID: 15566223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
