These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19114135)

  • 21. Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field.
    Rogé J; Pébayle T; Lambilliotte E; Spitzenstetter F; Giselbrecht D; Muzet A
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2737-44. PubMed ID: 15358068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Useful visual field reduction as a function of age and risk of accident in simulated car driving.
    Rogé J; Pébayle T; Campagne A; Muzet A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1774-9. PubMed ID: 15851581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Driver-initiated distractions: examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19114145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In-vehicle workload assessment: effects of traffic situations and cellular telephone use.
    Liu BS; Lee YH
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 16515796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction.
    Reed-Jones J; Trick LM; Matthews M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):628-34. PubMed ID: 18329415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diazepam impairs temporal dynamics of visual attention.
    Boucart M; Waucquier N; Michael GA; Libersa C
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Feb; 15(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 17295590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of auditory and visual distracters on the useful field of view: implications for the driving task.
    Wood J; Chaparro A; Hickson L; Thyer N; Carter P; Hancock J; Hoe A; Le I; Sahetapy L; Ybarzabal F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4646-50. PubMed ID: 17003463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shifting attention across near and far spaces: implications for the use of hands-free cell phones while driving.
    Ferlazzo F; Fagioli S; Di Nocera F; Sdoia S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1859-64. PubMed ID: 19068287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Providing views of the driving scene to drivers' conversation partners mitigates cell-phone-related distraction.
    Gaspar JG; Street WN; Windsor MB; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Kramer AF; Mathewson KE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2136-46. PubMed ID: 25304886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An experimental study on the effect of mobile phone conversation on drivers' reaction time in braking response.
    Al-Darrab IA; Khan ZA; Ishrat SI
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 19527811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual and attentional effects on drivers' speed selection at curves.
    Charlton SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Sep; 36(5):877-84. PubMed ID: 15203365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance.
    Törnros JE; Bolling AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Sep; 37(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 15946638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task.
    van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Fias W
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 19726035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A driving-emulation task to study the integration of goals with obligatory and prohibitory traffic signs.
    Roca J; Castro C; Bueno M; Moreno-Ríos S
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 21514565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation.
    Patten CJ; Kircher A; Ostlund J; Nilsson L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 15003578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention.
    Casarotti M; Michielin M; Zorzi M; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2007 Jan; 102(1):101-17. PubMed ID: 17046735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Directional collisions during a route-following task.
    Thomas NA; Stuckel D; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Mar; 15(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 19203435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.