1104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19114886)
41. Volumetric assessment of left heart preload by thermodilution: comparing the PiCCO-VoLEF system with transoesophageal echocardiography.
Hofer CK; Ganter MT; Matter-Ensner S; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Anaesthesia; 2006 Apr; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16548948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Left ventricular end-diastolic area is a measure of cardiac preload in patients with early septic shock.
Scheuren K; Wente MN; Hainer C; Scheffler M; Lichtenstern C; Martin E; Schmidt J; Bopp C; Weigand MA
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):759-65. PubMed ID: 19390446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery.
Wyffels PA; Sergeant P; Wouters PF
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):704-9. PubMed ID: 20477782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dynamic and volumetric variables reliably predict fluid responsiveness in a porcine model with pleural effusion.
Broch O; Gruenewald M; Renner J; Meybohm P; Schöttler J; Heß K; Steinfath M; Bein B
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e56267. PubMed ID: 23418546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac surgery patients.
Cherpanath TG; Geerts BF; Maas JJ; de Wilde RB; Groeneveld AB; Jansen JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2016 Nov; 60(10):1395-1403. PubMed ID: 27624218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery.
Jeong DM; Ahn HJ; Park HW; Yang M; Kim JA; Park J
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1158-1165. PubMed ID: 28504996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?
Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution.
Breukers RM; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Jansen JR; Faes TJ; Twisk JW; Groeneveld AB
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):954-60. PubMed ID: 19652601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Continuously assessed right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a marker of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients.
Wiesenack C; Fiegl C; Keyser A; Laule S; Prasser C; Keyl C
Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 9(3):R226-33. PubMed ID: 15987394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Monnet X; Osman D; Ridel C; Lamia B; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC;
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
Kronas N; Kubitz JC; Forkl S; Kemming GI; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):780-3. PubMed ID: 21115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cardiac preload responsiveness in children with cardiovascular dysfunction or dilated cardiomyopathy: a multicenter observational study.
de la Oliva P; Menéndez-Suso JJ; Iglesias-Bouzas M; Álvarez-Rojas E; González-Gómez JM; Roselló P; Sánchez-Díaz JI; Jaraba S;
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Jan; 16(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 25360857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
