651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19114894)
21. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
Kronas N; Kubitz JC; Forkl S; Kemming GI; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):780-3. PubMed ID: 21115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles.
Cannesson M; Tran NP; Cho M; Hatib F; Michard F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 21926593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Assessment of stroke volume variation and intrathoracic blood volume index on the responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated canine with hemorrhagic shock].
Liu SQ; Qiu HB; Yang Y; Chen YM; Li JQ; Shen JF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 44(17):1216-9. PubMed ID: 17147872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCO variables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study.
Donati A; Nardella R; Gabbanelli V; Scarcella M; Romanelli M; Romagnoli L; Botticelli L; Pantanetti S; Pelaia P
Minerva Anestesiol; 2008; 74(7-8):367-74. PubMed ID: 18414371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of right ventricular insufficiency and guidance of volume therapy are facilitated by simultaneous monitoring of static and functional preload parameters.
Richter HP; Petersen C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA; Kubitz JC
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1051-5. PubMed ID: 21924635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic Variables Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in an Animal Model With Pericardial Effusion.
Broch O; Renner J; Meybohm P; Albrecht M; Höcker J; Haneya A; Steinfath M; Bein B; Gruenewald M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1205-11. PubMed ID: 27499343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does a positive end-expiratory pressure-induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study.
Lambert P; Sloth E; Smith B; Hansen LK; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Tønnesen E; Larsson A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17378779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
Perner A; Faber T
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
Wyffels PA; Durnez PJ; Helderweirt J; Stockman WM; De Kegel D
Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 17646504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.
Préau S; Saulnier F; Dewavrin F; Durocher A; Chagnon JL
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
