These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19115660)

  • 1. Palatopharyngeal wall perforation during Glidescope intubation.
    Leong WL; Lim Y; Sia AT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Nov; 36(6):870-4. PubMed ID: 19115660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Palatal and retropharyngeal injury secondary to intubation using the GlideScope® video laryngoscope.
    Thorley DS; Simons AR; Mirza O; Malik V
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 May; 97(4):e67-9. PubMed ID: 26263957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the incidence of sore throat postoperatively increase with the use of a traditional intubation blade or the GlideScope?
    Cirilla DJ; Ngo J; Vaisman V; Daly C; Ata A; Sandison M; Roberts K
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Dec; 27(8):646-51. PubMed ID: 26277231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
    Vincent RD; Wimberly MP; Brockwell RC; Magnuson JS
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):619-21. PubMed ID: 18083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft palate trauma induced during GlideScope intubation.
    Allencherril JP; Joseph L
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():278-280. PubMed ID: 27871543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation.
    Puchner W; Drabauer L; Kern K; Mayer C; Bierbaumer J; Rehak PH; Gombotz H
    J Clin Anesth; 2011 Jun; 23(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21663811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
    Cooper RM
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Jan; 54(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 17197469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Utility of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Intubation.
    Chang JE; Kim H; Min SW; Lee JM; Ryu JH; Yoon S; Hwang JY
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Feb; 32(1):290-296. PubMed ID: 29132804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maneuvers to prevent oropharyngeal injury during orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope.
    Dupanovic M
    J Clin Anesth; 2010 Mar; 22(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 20304363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
    Manickam BP; Adhikary SD
    J Clin Anesth; 2008 Aug; 20(5):401-402. PubMed ID: 18761255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharyngeal injury related to GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
    Hirabayashi Y
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jul; 137(1):175-6. PubMed ID: 17599592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation.
    Hsu HT; Chou SH; Wu PJ; Tseng KY; Kuo YW; Chou CY; Cheng KI
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 22324297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stylet- or forceps-guided tube exchanger to facilitate GlideScope intubation in simulated difficult intubations--a randomised controlled trial.
    Jeon WJ; Shim JH; Cho SY; Baek SJ
    Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 23590463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
    Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.
    Tseng KY; Lu IC; Shen YC; Lin CH; Chen PN; Cheng KI
    Asian J Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 55(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 28846537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Unanticipated Airway Finding After Orotracheal Intubation With a GlideScope Videolaryngoscope.
    Pagel PS; Chapel MA; Georgeson AR; Traudt EA; Little RE; Loehrl TA; Somberg LB
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Mar; 33(3):873-875. PubMed ID: 30213637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The video laryngoscopes blind spots and possible lingual nerve injury by the Gliderite rigid stylet--case presentation and review of literature.
    Magboul MM; Joel S
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(6):857-60. PubMed ID: 21526673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Hodd JA; Doyle DJ; Gupta S; Dalton JE; Cata JP; Brewer EJ; James M; Sessler DI
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 21890882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.