These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19116400)

  • 1. Transparent film dressing vs pressure dressing after percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography.
    McIe S; Petitte T; Pride L; Leeper D; Ostrow CL
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):14-9; quiz 20. PubMed ID: 19116400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Groin dressing after cardiac catheterization. Comparison between light dressing with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm) and conventional tight/pressure dressing with an elastic adhesive bandage (Tensoplast).
    Boonbaichaiyapruck S; Hutayanon P; Chanthanamatta P; Dumrongwatana T; Intarayotha N; Krisdee V; Yamvong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Dec; 84(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 11999819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comfort and bleeding after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: comparison of a flexible sheath and a standard sheath.
    Mayer DM; Hendrickx L
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 9283670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nursing interventions to decrease bleeding at the femoral access site after percutaneous coronary intervention. SANDBAG Nursing Coordinators. Standards of Angioplasty Nursing Techniques to Diminish Bleeding Around the Groin.
    Juran NB; Rouse CL; Smith DD; O'Brien MA; DeLuca SA; Sigmon K
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Sep; 8(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 10467467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation.
    Schiks IE; Schoonhoven L; Aengevaeren WR; Nogarede-Hoekstra C; van Achterberg T; Verheugt FW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jul; 18(13):1862-70. PubMed ID: 19077015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Randomized comparison between collagen administration and pressure dressings for occlusion of the arterial puncture after coronary angiography and coronary dilatation].
    Schräder R; Steinbacher S; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1992 Sep; 81(9):507-11. PubMed ID: 1441705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of complications in percutaneous coronary intervention patients mobilized at 3, 4, and 6 hours after femoral arterial sheath removal.
    Walker S; Jen C; McCosker F; Cleary S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 18728513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
    Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing time in bed after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (TIBS III).
    Keeling AW; Fisher CA; Haugh KH; Powers ER; Turner MS
    Am J Crit Care; 2000 May; 9(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 10800603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of music on patients undergoing a C-clamp procedure after percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Chan MF; Wong OC; Chan HL; Fong MC; Lai SY; Lo CW; Ho SM; Ng SY; Leung SK
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Mar; 53(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16553675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations.
    Wedmore I; McManus JG; Pusateri AE; Holcomb JB
    J Trauma; 2006 Mar; 60(3):655-8. PubMed ID: 16531872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of an opaque foam dressing versus a transparent film dressing in the management of skin tears in institutionalized subjects.
    Thomas DR; Goode PS; LaMaster K; Tennyson T; Parnell LK
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):22-4, 27-8. PubMed ID: 10655859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitated wound healing using transparent film dressing following Mohs micrographic surgery.
    Hien NT; Prawer SE; Katz HI
    Arch Dermatol; 1988 Jun; 124(6):903-6. PubMed ID: 3377519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of dressings on saphenous vein harvest incision pain, distress and cosmetic result.
    Wipke-Tevis DD; Stotts NA
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1998; 13(3):3-13. PubMed ID: 9950019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
    Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients' responses to the angioplasty experience: a qualitative study.
    Gulanick M; Bliley A; Perino B; Keough V
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Jan; 6(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9116782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two wound dressings after laser skin resurfacing.
    Khatri KA; Margolis RJ; Bhatty RS; Garcia V
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(3-4):206-12. PubMed ID: 16414910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Transparent adhesive tape as postoperative dressing. Randomized, clinical study for comparison with a conventional dressing technic].
    Rohde H; Thon K; Stöltzing H; Schirren J
    Chirurg; 1981 Jan; 52(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 7009090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.