BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19116847)

  • 1. Temporal facilitation prior to voluntary muscle relaxation.
    Sugawara K; Tanabe S; Higashi T; Tsurumi T; Kasai T
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 19116847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.
    Hamada M; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Arai N; Furubayashi T; Inomata-Terada S; Yugeta A; Matsumoto H; Shirota Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2672-82. PubMed ID: 17977788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to measure the distribution of latencies of motor evoked potentials in man.
    Firmin L; Müller S; Rösler KM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):176-82. PubMed ID: 20630798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bilateral motor resonance evoked by observation of a one-hand movement: role of the primary motor cortex.
    Borroni P; Montagna M; Cerri G; Baldissera F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(7):1427-35. PubMed ID: 18973569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to muscles moving hand and fingers while viewing a reaching and grasping action.
    Montagna M; Cerri G; Borroni P; Baldissera F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 22(6):1513-20. PubMed ID: 16190904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans.
    Di Lazzaro V; Pilato F; Oliviero A; Dileone M; Saturno E; Mazzone P; Insola A; Profice P; Ranieri F; Capone F; Tonali PA; Rothwell JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):1765-71. PubMed ID: 16760345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetric facilitation from repeated paired magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.
    Hammond GR; Gillooly NJ
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):479-82. PubMed ID: 18287951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the potential role of the corticospinal tract in the control and progressive adaptation of the soleus h-reflex during backward walking.
    Ung RV; Imbeault MA; Ethier C; Brizzi L; Capaday C
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1133-42. PubMed ID: 15829598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Caveats when studying motor cortex excitability and the cortical control of movement using transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Burke D; Pierrot-Deseilligny E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 20004614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote facilitation of supraspinal motor excitability depends on the level of effort.
    Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Shiozawa S; Komiyama T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(7):1297-305. PubMed ID: 19769593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First Prize: Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Dishman JD; Ball KA; Burke J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Jan; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11898013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corticospinal inhibition of transmission in propriospinal-like neurones during human walking.
    Iglesias C; Nielsen JB; Marchand-Pauvert V
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(7):1351-61. PubMed ID: 18973562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Muscle-specific variations in use-dependent crossed-facilitation of corticospinal pathways mediated by transcranial direct current (DC) stimulation.
    Carson RG; Kennedy NC; Linden MA; Britton L
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18582535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulations and motor evoked potentials.
    Jennum P; Winkel H; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 36(6):341-8. PubMed ID: 8891473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vibration prolongs the cortical silent period in an antagonistic muscle.
    Binder C; Kaya AE; Liepert J
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jun; 39(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19334048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysteresis effects on the input-output curve of motor evoked potentials.
    Möller C; Arai N; Lücke J; Ziemann U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):1003-8. PubMed ID: 19329358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An initial transient-state and reliable measures of corticospinal excitability in TMS studies.
    Schmidt S; Cichy RM; Kraft A; Brocke J; Irlbacher K; Brandt SA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):987-93. PubMed ID: 19359215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two different effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the human motor cortex during the pre-movement period.
    Hashimoto T; Inaba D; Matsumura M; Naito E
    Neurosci Res; 2004 Dec; 50(4):427-36. PubMed ID: 15567480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corticospinal control of wrist muscles during expectation of a motor perturbation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Meziane HB; Spieser L; Pailhous J; Bonnard M
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19073218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further evidence for excitability changes in human primary motor cortex during ipsilateral voluntary contractions.
    Liang N; Murakami T; Funase K; Narita T; Kasai T
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18261851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.