161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19116852)
1. Real-life step and activity measurement: reliability and validity.
Busse ME; van Deursen RW; Wiles CM
J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 19116852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of activity in older adults: reliability and validity of the Step Activity Monitor.
Resnick B; Nahm ES; Orwig D; Zimmerman SS; Magaziner J
J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 11881269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-retest reliability of the IDEEA system in the quantification of step parameters during walking and stair climbing.
Gorelick ML; Bizzini M; Maffiuletti NA; Munzinger JP; Munzinger U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Jul; 29(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 19302230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambulatory activity in men with diabetes: relationship between self-reported and real-world performance-based measures.
Smith DG; Domholdt E; Coleman KL; Del Aguila MA; Boone DA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 Jul; 41(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 15558385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of ambulatory walking activity in patients with hematologic malignancies.
Knols RH; de Bruin ED; Aufdemkampe G; Uebelhart D; Aaronson NK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 90(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 19154830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.
Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA
J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How reproducible is home-based 24-hour ambulatory monitoring of motor activity in patients with multiple sclerosis?
Rietberg MB; van Wegen EE; Uitdehaag BM; de Vet HC; Kwakkel G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 91(10):1537-41. PubMed ID: 20875511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of spatiotemporal gait data for young and older women during continuous overground walking.
Paterson KL; Hill KD; Lythgo ND; Maschette W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 89(12):2360-5. PubMed ID: 19061748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the performance of the activPAL Professional physical activity logger to a discrete accelerometer-based activity monitor.
Godfrey A; Culhane KM; Lyons GM
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):930-4. PubMed ID: 17134934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in Japanese elderly people.
Hagiwara A; Ito N; Sawai K; Kazuma K
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2008 Sep; 8(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 18821997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ).
Ota E; Haruna M; Yanai H; Suzuki M; Anh DD; Matsuzaki M; Tho le H; Ariyoshi K; Yeo SA; Murashima S
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2008 May; 39(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 18564699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking.
Ryan CG; Grant PM; Tigbe WW; Granat MH
Br J Sports Med; 2006 Sep; 40(9):779-84. PubMed ID: 16825270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized voluntary force measurement in a lower extremity rehabilitation robot.
Bolliger M; Banz R; Dietz V; Lünenburger L
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 5():23. PubMed ID: 18957092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of step length and step width measurement after traumatic brain injury.
van Loo MA; Moseley AM; Bosman JM; de Bie RA; Hassett L
Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 25(21):1195-200. PubMed ID: 14578058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of the habitual activity estimation scale (HAES) in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Wells GD; Wilkes DL; Schneiderman-Walker J; Elmi M; Tullis E; Lands LC; Ratjen F; Coates AL
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18306334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excellent inter-rater, intra-rater, and telephone-administered reliability of the ALSFRS-R in a multicenter clinical trial.
Kaufmann P; Levy G; Montes J; Buchsbaum R; Barsdorf AI; Battista V; Arbing R; Gordon PH; Mitsumoto H; Levin B; Thompson JL;
Amyotroph Lateral Scler; 2007 Feb; 8(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 17364435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two different physical activity monitors.
Paul DR; Kramer M; Moshfegh AJ; Baer DJ; Rumpler WV
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():26. PubMed ID: 17592631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: reliability and validity of measures from a portable device.
Maluf KS; Morley RE; Richter EJ; Klaesner JW; Mueller MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 82(8):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Goniometry and linear assessments to monitor movement outcomes: are they reliable tools in burn survivors?
Edgar D; Finlay V; Wu A; Wood F
Burns; 2009 Feb; 35(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 18950951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
