123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1911687)
1. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods.
Davis DN; Mackay F
Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1911687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Eastman Standard Incisor Angulations: are they still appropriate?
MacAllister MJ; Rock WP
Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1562579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Cho HJ
J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.
Tsai HH
ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):27-32, 10. PubMed ID: 11324403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical evaluation of the pitchfork analysis.
Männchen R
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Feb; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11296506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second Class Resolver: a retrospective analysis.
D'Attilio M; Rodolfino D; Filippakos A; Saccucci M; Festa F; Tripodi D
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 24745598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of overbite on the maxillary and mandibular morphology.
Ceylan I; Eröz UB
Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11302586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of primary correction of nasal septal deformity in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology.
Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Gawrych E; Wędrychowska-Szulc B; Stepien P; Konury J; Wilk G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 23273648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
Kerr WJ; Miller S; Ayme B; Wilhelm N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
Anwar N; Fida M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
