These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1911699)

  • 1. A comparison of orthodontic treatment changes as measured from study casts and cephalometric radiographs.
    Jones ML
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 1911699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Barry Project--a cephalometric assessment of treatment change in a consecutive sample of malocclusion.
    Jones ML; Robertson NR
    Br J Orthod; 1992 May; 19(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1627531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation reduction using a modified collimated lateral skull radiograph during orthodontic treatment.
    Mandall NA; O'Brien KD; Worthington HV
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Nov; 2(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 10806941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of mandibular incisor extraction on anterior occlusion in adults with Class III malocclusion and reduced overbite.
    Faerovig E; Zachrisson BU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 9971920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing incisor inclination: a non-invasive technique.
    Richmond S; Klufas ML; Sywanyk M
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 9926639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?
    Devereux L; Moles D; Cunningham SJ; McKnight M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e175-81. PubMed ID: 21300228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cephalometric "normal values" for the position of the incisors--a possible cause of failure in orthodontic treatments?].
    Schopf P
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Feb; 49(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3163671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric analysis of dental and skeletal changes following treatment with a passive self-ligating system.
    Ehsani S; Carlyle T; El-Bialy T; Kusnoto B
    J Clin Orthod; 2012 May; 46(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 22785041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Changes of point A during orthodontic treatment of Angle Class 3 malocclusion].
    Kawata T; Nakagawa H; Fujii M; Kushima F; Otani S
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Jun; 30(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 5283450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis.
    Byland J
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods.
    Jabbal A; Cobourne M; Donaldson N; Bister D
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 25888531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional analysis of dental casts based on a newly defined palatal reference plane.
    Hayashi K; Uechi J; Mizoguchi I
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 14580021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thin-plate spline (TPS) graphical analysis of the mandible on cephalometric radiographs.
    Chang HP; Liu PH; Chang HF; Chang CH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 12076055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Durão AR; Alqerban A; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 25191839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage.
    Troy BA; Shanker S; Fields HW; Vig K; Johnston W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):146.e1-9; discussion 146-7. PubMed ID: 19201319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cephalometric study of the vertical dimension of cases of class II, division I malocclusion, demonstrating a strong incisor supraclusion and treated by the Bimler therapeutic method].
    Stromboni Y; Mosse A
    Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 4534445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
    Knösel M; Jung K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.