851 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19117060)
21. Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores.
Grossklaus DJ; Coffey CS; Shappell SB; Jack GS; Cookson MS
BJU Int; 2001 Nov; 88(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 11890243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative prostate needle biopsy p27 correlates with subsequent radical prostatectomy p27, Gleason grade and pathological stage.
Thomas GV; Schrage MI; Rosenfelt L; Kim JH; Salur G; deKernion JB; Dorey F; Said J; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1987-91. PubMed ID: 11061897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ki67 labelling index: an independent predictor of progression in prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.
Bubendorf L; Sauter G; Moch H; Schmid HP; Gasser TC; Jordan P; Mihatsch MJ
J Pathol; 1996 Apr; 178(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 8691323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
de la Taille A; Rubin MA; Bagiella E; Olsson CA; Buttyan R; Burchardt T; Knight C; O'Toole KM; Katz AE
J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10379750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does Ki-67 staining improve quantitative histology in preoperative prostate cancer staging?
Pepe P; Fraggetta F; Candiano G; Aragona F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2012 Mar; 84(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22649958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.
Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of percentage of total prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer to percentage of cores with cancer for predicting PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Csathy GS; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Dorey F; Terris MK;
Urology; 2003 Apr; 61(4):742-7. PubMed ID: 12670558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the prognostic potential of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase (HYAL-1), CD44v6 and microvessel density for prostate cancer.
Ekici S; Cerwinka WH; Duncan R; Gomez P; Civantos F; Soloway MS; Lokeshwar VB
Int J Cancer; 2004 Oct; 112(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 15305383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Side-specific factors associated with extracapsular extension and seminal vesicular invasion in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Sankin A; Tareen B; Lepor H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2009; 12(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 19238170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
