These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19117221)

  • 1. Setting and maintaining standards in multiple choice examinations: AMEE Guide No. 37.
    Bandaranayake RC
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19117221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A standard setting method with the best performing students as point of reference: practical and affordable.
    Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 20163232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A plea for the proper use of criterion-referenced tests in medical assessment.
    Ricketts C
    Med Educ; 2009 Dec; 43(12):1141-6. PubMed ID: 19930504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Setting pass scores for clinical skills assessment.
    Liu M; Liu KM
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 24(12):656-63. PubMed ID: 19251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. do discussion and iteration have an influence?
    Fowell SL; Fewtrell R; McLaughlin PJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16957872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard setting in a small scale OSCE: a comparison of the Modified Borderline-Group Method and the Borderline Regression Method.
    Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto SM; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 16729239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Setting a standard on the pilot National Board Dental Examination.
    Kramer GA; DeMarais DR
    J Dent Educ; 1992 Oct; 56(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 1430520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating the standard for the National Board Dental Examination Part II.
    Tsai TH; Neumann LM; Littlefield JH
    J Dent Educ; 2012 May; 76(5):540-4. PubMed ID: 22550099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.
    Hess B; Subhiyah RG; Giordano C
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85.
    McKinley DW; Norcini JJ
    Med Teach; 2014 Feb; 36(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24256050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; Van der Vleuten C; Hoogstraten J; Van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Aug; 12(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 18666893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.
    Ricketts C; Freeman AC; Coombes LR
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 19493184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
    Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Description and impact of using a standard-setting method for determining pass/fail scores in a surgery clerkship.
    Schindler N; Corcoran J; DaRosa D
    Am J Surg; 2007 Feb; 193(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 17236857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Dec; 26(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 14631613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education.
    Downing SM; Tekian A; Yudkowsky R
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 16354141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.