303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19117275)
1. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Aydin Ü; Khan A; Gross J; Zervakis M; Rampp S; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117353. PubMed ID: 32919058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel method for calibrating head models to account for variability in conductivity and its evaluation in a sphere model.
Schrader S; Antonakakis M; Rampp S; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245043. PubMed ID: 33113524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution EEG source localization in personalized segmentation-free head model with multi-dipole fitting.
Hirata A; Niitsu M; Phang CR; Kodera S; Kida T; Rashed EA; Fukunaga M; Sadato N; Wasaka T
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38306964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to EEG Source Localization of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.
Shirvany Y; Mahmood Q; Edelvik F; Jakobsson S; Hedstrom A; Persson M
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jan; 22(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 24122569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Realistic human head model for EEG from both the geometry and conductivity aspects.
Wen P; Pope K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12854618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the EEG inverse problem.
Cook MJ; Koles ZJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4563-6. PubMed ID: 19163731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
