These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19117518)

  • 21. GLIDERS--a web-based search engine for genome-wide linkage disequilibrium between HapMap SNPs.
    Lawrence R; Day-Williams AG; Mott R; Broxholme J; Cardon LR; Zeggini E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 10():367. PubMed ID: 19878600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the influence of quality control decisions and software algorithms on SNP calling for the affymetrix 6.0 SNP array platform.
    de Andrade M; Atkinson EJ; Bamlet WR; Matsumoto ME; Maharjan S; Slager SL; Vachon CM; Cunningham JM; Kardia SL
    Hum Hered; 2011; 71(4):221-33. PubMed ID: 21734406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability in GWAS analysis: the impact of genotype calling algorithm inconsistencies.
    Miclaus K; Chierici M; Lambert C; Zhang L; Vega S; Hong H; Yin S; Furlanello C; Wolfinger R; Goodsaid F
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2010 Aug; 10(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 20676070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Design of tag SNP whole genome genotyping arrays.
    Peiffer DA; Gunderson KL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 529():51-61. PubMed ID: 19381970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quick, "imputation-free" meta-analysis with proxy-SNPs.
    Meesters C; Leber M; Herold C; Angisch M; Mattheisen M; Drichel D; Lacour A; Becker T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():231. PubMed ID: 22971100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identity by descent estimation with dense genome-wide genotype data.
    Han L; Abney M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 35(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 21769932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discovery of novel variants in genotyping arrays improves genotype retention and reduces ascertainment bias.
    Didion JP; Yang H; Sheppard K; Fu CP; McMillan L; de Villena FP; Churchill GA
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Jan; 13():34. PubMed ID: 22260749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip.
    Spencer CC; Su Z; Donnelly P; Marchini J
    PLoS Genet; 2009 May; 5(5):e1000477. PubMed ID: 19492015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pharmacogenetic content of commercial genome-wide genotyping arrays.
    Lemieux Perreault LP; Zaïd N; Cameron M; Mongrain I; Dubé MP
    Pharmacogenomics; 2018 Oct; 19(15):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 30272537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative linkage analysis and visualization of high-density oligonucleotide SNP array data.
    Leykin I; Hao K; Cheng J; Meyer N; Pollak MR; Smith RJ; Wong WH; Rosenow C; Li C
    BMC Genet; 2005 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 15713228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study on the concordance between different SNP-genotyping platforms in sheep.
    Marina H; Chitneedi P; Pelayo R; Suárez-Vega A; Esteban-Blanco C; Gutiérrez-Gil B; Arranz JJ
    Anim Genet; 2021 Dec; 52(6):868-880. PubMed ID: 34515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment and implications of linkage disequilibrium in genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite panels.
    Goode EL; Jarvik GP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S72-6. PubMed ID: 16342185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial normalization improves the quality of genotype calling for Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays.
    Chai HS; Therneau TM; Bailey KR; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():356. PubMed ID: 20587065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. fcGENE: a versatile tool for processing and transforming SNP datasets.
    Roshyara NR; Scholz M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e97589. PubMed ID: 25050709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and Validation of a High-Density SNP Genotyping Array for African Oil Palm.
    Kwong QB; Teh CK; Ong AL; Heng HY; Lee HL; Mohamed M; Low JZ; Apparow S; Chew FT; Mayes S; Kulaveerasingam H; Tammi M; Appleton DR
    Mol Plant; 2016 Aug; 9(8):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 27112659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating genotyping error rates from Mendelian errors in SNP array genotypes and their impact on inference.
    Saunders IW; Brohede J; Hannan GN
    Genomics; 2007 Sep; 90(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 17587543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation.
    Nothnagel M; Ellinghaus D; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Franke A
    Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 125(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19089453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A genotype calling algorithm for affymetrix SNP arrays.
    Rabbee N; Speed TP
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16267090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The extent of linkage disequilibrium and computational challenges of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genome-wide association studies.
    Huang YT; Chang CJ; Chao KM
    Curr Drug Metab; 2011 Jun; 12(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 21453276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MA-SNP--A new genotype calling method for oligonucleotide SNP arrays modeling the batch effect with a normal mixture model.
    Wen Y; Li M; Fu WJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011 Aug; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 23089827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.