BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19118565)

  • 1. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1939-47. PubMed ID: 17240408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation.
    Franz VH; Gegenfurtner KR
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):920-50. PubMed ID: 19378412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.
    Cohen NR; Cross ES; Tunik E; Grafton ST; Culham JC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19168086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual illusions on grasping.
    Franz VH; Fahle M; Bülthoff HH; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1124-44. PubMed ID: 11642699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociations between vision for perception and vision for action depend on the relative availability of egocentric and allocentric information.
    Cañal-Bruland R; Voorwald F; Wielaard K; van der Kamp J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1206-14. PubMed ID: 23670269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Müller-Lyer illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Qiu J; Li H; Zhang Q; Liu Q; Zhang F
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Feb; 77(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 17996352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action.
    Keetch KM; Glazebrook CM; Lyons J; Lam MY; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(1-2):117-21. PubMed ID: 16901634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memory mechanisms in grasping.
    Hesse C; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1532-45. PubMed ID: 18775734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventral and dorsal stream interactions during the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion: evidence derived from fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.
    Plewan T; Weidner R; Eickhoff SB; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 24(10):2015-29. PubMed ID: 22721374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct task-independent visual thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up.
    De Wit MM; Van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1410-8. PubMed ID: 22868214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping behavior in schizophrenia suggests selective impairment in the dorsal visual pathway.
    King JP; Christensen BK; Westwood DA
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2008 Nov; 117(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 19025227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
    de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1261():54-64. PubMed ID: 19401180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
    Mendoza JE; Elliott D; Meegan DV; Lyons JL; Welsh TN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 16634679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.