253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19120647)
1. A Bayesian modelling framework to estimate Campylobacter prevalence and culture methods sensitivity: application to a chicken meat survey in Belgium.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; De Zutter L; Berkvens D
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 105(6):2002-8. PubMed ID: 19120647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Processing practices contributing to Campylobacter contamination in Belgian chicken meat preparations.
Sampers I; Habib I; Berkvens D; Dumoulin A; Zutter LD; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 18947895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simple and rapid detection of Campylobacter spp. in naturally contaminated chicken-meat samples by combination of a two-step enrichment method with an immunochromatographic assay.
Kawatsu K; Taguchi M; Yonekita T; Matsumoto T; Morimatsu F; Kumeda Y
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 142(1-2):256-9. PubMed ID: 20621373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sensitivity and specificity of fecal and cecal culture for the detection of Campylobacter in Dutch broiler flocks quantified by Bayesian analysis.
Woldemariam E; Bouma A; Vernooij JC; Stegeman A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 121(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 18068250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baseline data from a Belgium-wide survey of Campylobacter species contamination in chicken meat preparations and considerations for a reliable monitoring program.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 74(17):5483-9. PubMed ID: 18621867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. from chicken meat in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Luu QH; Tran TH; Phung DC; Nguyen TB
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Oct; 1081():273-5. PubMed ID: 17135525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of ISO 10272:2006 standard versus alternative enrichment and plating combinations for enumeration and detection of Campylobacter in chicken meat.
Habib I; Uyttendaele M; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1117-23. PubMed ID: 21645809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three methods for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chilled or frozen meat.
Paulsen P; Kanzler P; Hilbert F; Mayrhofer S; Baumgartner S; Smulders FJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 103(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15985304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the "testing and scheduling" strategy for control of Campylobacter in broiler meat in The Netherlands.
Nauta MJ; van der Wal FJ; Putirulan FF; Post J; van de Kassteele J; Bolder NM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 134(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 19674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in poultry based meat preparations as one of the factors to support the development of risk-based microbiological criteria in Belgium.
Uyttendaele M; Baert K; Ghafir Y; Daube G; De Zutter L; Herman L; Dierick K; Pierard D; Dubois JJ; Horion B; Debevere J
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 111(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 16876277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. on the surface and within chicken breast fillets.
Luber P; Bartelt E
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 17241335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-utility analysis to control Campylobacter on chicken meat: dealing with data limitations.
Mangen MJ; Havelaar AH; Poppe KP; de Wit GA;
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):815-30. PubMed ID: 17958494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in chicken meat samples by real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with molecular beacons.
Churruca E; Girbau C; MartÃnez I; Mateo E; Alonso R; Fernández-Astorga A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 117(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 17395329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel method and simple apparatus for the detection of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in chicken meat products.
Wisessombat S; Kittiniyom K; Srimanote P; Wonglumsom W; Voravuthikunchai SP
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Feb; 76(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 18992776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling of Campylobacter survival in frozen chicken meat.
Ritz M; Nauta MJ; Teunis PF; van Leusden F; Federighi M; Havelaar AH
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 103(3):594-600. PubMed ID: 17714392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass rinse by real-time PCR.
Botteldoorn N; Van Coillie E; Piessens V; Rasschaert G; Debruyne L; Heyndrickx M; Herman L; Messens W
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 105(6):1909-18. PubMed ID: 19016974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A seven-year survey of Campylobacter contamination in meat at different production stages in Belgium.
Ghafir Y; China B; Dierick K; De Zutter L; Daube G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 17321622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of an improved method for detection of Campylobacter jejuni in foods.
Odongo R; Reilly SS; Gilliland SE
J Food Sci; 2009 Jun; 74(5):M207-12. PubMed ID: 19646049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]