These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19120810)

  • 1. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection.
    Hunt J; Breuker CJ; Sadowski JA; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 19120810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
    Wong BB; Candolin U
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 Nov; 80(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 16221329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
    Reichard M; Bryja J; Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Kaniewska P; Smith C
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and mate choice.
    Andersson M; Simmons LW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jun; 21(6):296-302. PubMed ID: 16769428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing the effects of familiarity, relatedness, and color pattern rarity on attractiveness and measuring their effects on sexual selection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
    Zajitschek SR; Brooks RC
    Am Nat; 2008 Dec; 172(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 18983251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos.
    McGlothlin JW; Parker PG; Nolan V; Ketterson ED
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):658-71. PubMed ID: 15856707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.
    Jones AG
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1673-84. PubMed ID: 19228185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection.
    Wade MJ; Shuster SM; Demuth JP
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 14582004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
    Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A change in competitive context reverses sexual selection on male size.
    Kasumovic MM; Andrade MC
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19032500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation.
    Verzijden MN; Lachlan RF; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 Oct; 59(10):2097-108. PubMed ID: 16405155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.