387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19121498)
1. Experimental determination of optimal force system required for control of anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics.
Sia S; Shibazaki T; Koga Y; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19121498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces in sliding mechanics. An in vivo study.
Sia S; Koga Y; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 18004933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment.
Feng Y; Kong WD; Cen WJ; Zhou XZ; Zhang W; Li QT; Guo HY; Yu JW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):210-219. PubMed ID: 31375231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Ghannam M; Kamiloğlu B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9975428. PubMed ID: 34056005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drift characteristics of miniscrews and molars for anchorage under orthodontic force: 3-dimensional computed tomography registration evaluation.
Liu H; Lv T; Wang NN; Zhao F; Wang KT; Liu DX
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e83-9. PubMed ID: 21195261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach.
Giancotti A; Greco M
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approximation and contact of the maxillary central incisor roots with the incisive canal after maximum retraction with temporary anchorage devices: Report of 2 patients.
Chung CJ; Choi YJ; Kim KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 26321347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion.
Koyama I; Iino S; Abe Y; Takano-Yamamoto T; Miyawaki S
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 21059875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.
Lombardo L; Scuzzo G; Arreghini A; Gorgun O; Ortan YO; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 24950350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimum conditions for parallel translation of maxillary anterior teeth under retraction force determined with the finite element method.
Kim T; Suh J; Kim N; Lee M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 20451783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of crown-root angle on stress distribution in the maxillary central incisors' PDL during application of intrusive and retraction forces: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Heravi F; Salari S; Tanbakuchi B; Loh S; Amiri M
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24326061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
