713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19121503)
1. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.
Shelly AD; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR; Fridrich KL; Mergen JL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 10842105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental and skeletal outcomes for Class II surgical-orthodontic treatment: A comparison between novice and experienced clinicians.
Potts B; Fields HW; Shanker S; Vig KW; Beck FM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 21392684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion.
de Lir Ade L; de Moura WL; Oliveira Ruellas AC; Gomes Souza MM; Nojima LI
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ability of orthodontists and laypeople to discriminate mandibular stepwise advancements in a Class II retrognathic mandible.
Barroso MC; Silva NC; Quintão CC; Normando D
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 23021117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.
Klaus K; Heumann C; Ruf S
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 28660422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue stability in segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.
Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 22204924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in soft tissue profile after mandibular setback surgery in Class III subjects.
Marşan G; Oztaş E; Kuvat SV; Cura N; Emekli U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 19153028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
