BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19121503)

  • 21. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
    Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lateral cephalometry changes after SARPE.
    Parhiz A; Schepers S; Lambrichts I; Vrielinck L; Sun Y; Politis C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):662-71. PubMed ID: 21489753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 17962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
    Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How the lower face soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement or setback.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 May; 19(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 18520370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
    Alves PV; Mazuchelli J; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 18362708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome.
    Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 11298309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mandibular "tripod" advancement of a Class II Division 2 deepbite malocclusion.
    Low LE; Moore TE; Austin KR; Burton RG; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 20152687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.
    McGuinness NJ; Burden DJ; Hunt OT; Johnston CD; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21392692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Soft tissue changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion after orthodontic and surgical treatments].
    Chen K; Zheng Y; Wang X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12593199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skeletal and dental stability of segmental distraction of the anterior mandibular alveolar process. A 2-year follow-up.
    Joss CU; Triaca A; Antonini M; Kiliaridis S; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 22356741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.