These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19121515)

  • 1. Effects of magnification methods and magnifier shapes on visual inspection.
    Lee FC; Chan AH
    Appl Ergon; 2009 May; 40(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 19121515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of learning for linear and differential video magnifiers.
    Lee FC; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1501-13. PubMed ID: 19941183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereoacuity and depth perception decrease with increased instrument magnification: comparing a non-magnified system with lens loupes and a surgical microscope.
    Du LT; Wessels IF; Underdahl JP; Auran JD
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The inter-relationship between magnification, field of view and contrast reserve: the effect on reading performance.
    Mohammed Z; Dickinson CM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Nov; 20(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 11127126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New ergonomic stand magnifiers.
    Spitzberg LA; Goodrich GL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Jan; 66(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 7884138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newly designed ergonomic surgical binocular telescope with angulated optic axis.
    Kim P; Joujiki M; Suzuki M; Ueki K; Amano Y
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Jul; 63(1 Suppl 1):ONS188-90; discussion ONS190-1. PubMed ID: 18728599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crowded task performance in visually impaired children: magnifier versus large print.
    Huurneman B; Boonstra FN; Verezen CA; Cillessen AH; van Rens G; Cox RF
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 251(7):1813-9. PubMed ID: 23504083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young children's use of a visual aid: an experimental study of the effectiveness of training.
    Cox RF; Reimer AM; Verezen CA; Smitsman AW; Vervloed MP; Boonstra NF
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2009 Jun; 51(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 19170723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control in the optical industry: From a work analysis of lens inspection to a training programme, an experimental case study.
    Rebsamen M; Boucheix JM; Fayol M
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 19747675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of spherical aberration on visual acuity at different contrasts.
    Li J; Xiong Y; Wang N; Li S; Dai Y; Xue L; Zhao H; Jiang W; Zhang Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1389-95. PubMed ID: 19631126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinician's guide to purchasing surgical loupes.
    Mansueto MA; Overton JD
    Tex Dent J; 2007 Feb; 124(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 17396708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical magnification matrix: near objects in the paraxial case.
    Becken W; Altheimer H; Esser G; Mueller W; Uttenweiler D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):581-92. PubMed ID: 18594337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing motion scaling and magnification in robotic surgery.
    Cassilly R; Diodato MD; Bottros M; Damiano RJ
    Surgery; 2004 Aug; 136(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 15300193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fresnel vs. conventional prisms: their effects on the apparent fronto-parallel plane horopter.
    Brunnett SM; Munson MT; Kirschen DG
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jul; 65(7):519-26. PubMed ID: 3207155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced visualization during dental practice using magnification systems.
    Strassler HE; Syme SE; Serio F; Kaim JM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Jun; 19(6):595-8, 600, 602 passim; quiz 612. PubMed ID: 9693517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.
    Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnification labels for stand magnifiers: always misleading and usually unachievable.
    Brown WL; Siemsen DW
    Optometry; 2008 Jan; 79(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18156091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and optical performance before and after rotation of a misaligned STAAR Toric Implantable Collamer Lens.
    Hamdi IM
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10 Suppl):S934-8. PubMed ID: 19848374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hands-free administration of subjective workload scales: acceptability in a surgical training environment.
    Carswell CM; Lio CH; Grant R; Klein MI; Clarke D; Seales WB; Strup S
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Dec; 42(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 20630495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeatability of reading ability indices in subjects with impaired vision.
    Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3643-7. PubMed ID: 19339738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.