These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19121963)

  • 21. Diagnostic ability of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for impacted third molars.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 15953921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morphodigital study of bone quality in the mandibular angle in patients with third molar impacted.
    Watanabe PC; Alonso MB; Monteiro SA; Tiossi R; Issa JP
    Anat Sci Int; 2009 Sep; 84(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 19326188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dental radiographic features of impacted third molars and some management implications.
    Owotade FJ; Fatusi OA; Ibitoye B; Otuyemi OD
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2003 Sep; 26(103):9-14. PubMed ID: 14705372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians.
    Al-Khateeb TH; Bataineh AB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 64(11):1598-602. PubMed ID: 17052585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preliminary results of a study comparing conventional radiography with phase-contrast radiography for assessing root morphology of mandibular third molars.
    Sato T; Nakamoto N; Abe T; Fukushima Y; Tomaru Y; Sakata Y; Nakazawa M; Nakamoto A; Kawasaki H; Wada Y; Ohara H; Araki R; Tanaka J; Yoda T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 21239571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okouchi K; Fujiwara Y; Yamashiro M; Maruoka Y; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relative impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty of removing impacted mandibular third molars.
    Akadiri OA; Obiechina AE; Arotiba JT; Fasola AO
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 18473027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of Perception of Pain with E-Speed Film, CCD Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plates for Intraoral Radiographs in Children using Three Pain Rating Scales.
    Juneja S; Dalvi S; Aggarwal R; Sukhija M; Singh S; Bansal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 38934750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic predictability of digital versus conventional panoramic radiographs in the presurgical evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Ferrús-Torres E; Gargallo-Albiol J; Berini-Aytés L; Gay-Escoda C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19660912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars.
    Mahasantipiya PM; Savage NW; Monsour PA; Wilson RJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):154-63. PubMed ID: 15897286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars.
    Wenzel A; Aagaard E; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):255-63. PubMed ID: 9879213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
    Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
    Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.