These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19122057)

  • 1. Symmetrical generalization decrements: configural stimulus processing in human contingency learning.
    Thorwart A; Lachnit H
    Learn Behav; 2009 Feb; 37(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 19122057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalization decrements: further support for flexibility in stimulus processing.
    Thorwart A; Lachnit H
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21048227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of associative learning with the replaced elements model.
    Glautier S
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Nov; 39(4):993-1000. PubMed ID: 18183917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ALTSim: a MATLAB simulator for current associative learning theories.
    Thorwart A; Schultheis H; König S; Lachnit H
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19182121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
    Redhead ES
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalization decrement in human contingency learning.
    Wheeler DS; Amundson JC; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jul; 59(7):1212-23. PubMed ID: 16769621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior beliefs influence symmetrical or asymmetrical generalizations in human causal learning.
    Nishiyama R; Nagaishi T; Masaki T
    Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):300-312. PubMed ID: 28432591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The representation of stimulus conjunction in theories of associative learning: A context-dependent added-elements model.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):185-204. PubMed ID: 32730078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indicators of early and late processing reveal the importance of within-trial-time for theories of associative learning.
    Lachnit H; Thorwart A; Schultheis H; Lotz A; Koenig S; Uengoer M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66291. PubMed ID: 23826092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance to interference in human associative learning: evidence of configural processing.
    Shanks DR; Darby RJ; Charles D
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Apr; 24(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 9556907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Still the same in human causal reasoning: Evidence for a uniform similarity parameter in generalisation and summation.
    Whitlow JW; Brandon SE; Otero K; Christensen J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):425-442. PubMed ID: 32988296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus similarity affects patterning discrimination learning.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):128-148. PubMed ID: 29683694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
    Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus discriminability and induction as independent components of generalization.
    Lovibond PF; Lee JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1106-1120. PubMed ID: 31580122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees.
    Giurfa M; Schubert M; Reisenman C; Gerber B; Lachnit H
    Behav Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 145(1-2):161-9. PubMed ID: 14529814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of age on children's learning of problems that require a configural association solution.
    Rudy JW; Keith JR; Georgen K
    Dev Psychobiol; 1993 Apr; 26(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 8314437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.