BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1912269)

  • 1. Tests of homogeneity for the relative risk in multiply-matched case-control studies.
    Zelterman D; Le CT
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):751-5. PubMed ID: 1912269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo investigation of homogeneity tests of the odds ratio under various sample size configurations.
    Jones MP; O'Gorman TW; Lemke JH; Woolson RF
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 2720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tests of the null hypothesis in case-control studies.
    Lustbader ED; Moolgavkar SH; Venzon DJ
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1017-24. PubMed ID: 6534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inference for odds ratio regression models with sparse dependent data.
    Hanfelt JJ; Liang KY
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):136-47. PubMed ID: 9544512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cluster sampling on epidemiologic analysis in population-based case-control studies.
    Graubard BI; Fears TR; Gail MH
    Biometrics; 1989 Dec; 45(4):1053-71. PubMed ID: 2611317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computing power in case-control association studies through the use of quadratic approximations: application to meta-statistics.
    Guedj M; Della-Chiesa E; Picard F; Nuel G
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):262-70. PubMed ID: 17032289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).
    Morgenthaler S; Thilly WG
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 615(1-2):28-56. PubMed ID: 17101154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Laird NM; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 9544513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mantel-Haenszel test statistics for correlated binary data.
    Zhang J; Boos DD
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1185-98. PubMed ID: 9423245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of concordant pairs in matched case-control studies.
    Liang KY; Zeger SL
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1145-56. PubMed ID: 3233251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing nonlinear regression parameters under heteroscedastic, normally distributed errors.
    Kimura DK
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 2242410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power calculations for matched case-control studies.
    Dupont WD
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1157-68. PubMed ID: 3233252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximate interval estimation of the ratio of binomial parameters: a review and corrections for skewness.
    Gart JJ; Nam J
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 3291957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing mean squared error in the analysis of stratified epidemiologic studies.
    Greenland S
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):773-5; discussion 776. PubMed ID: 1912271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of matched case-control data in presence of nonignorable missing exposure.
    Sinha S; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 17573865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two-phase analyses for case-control genetic association studies.
    Zheng G; Meyer M; Li W; Yang Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):5054-75. PubMed ID: 18570272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing mean squared error in the analysis of pair-matched case-control studies.
    Kalish LA
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):493-9. PubMed ID: 2364134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity analysis for matched case-control studies.
    Rosenbaum PR
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 2049516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.
    Geneletti S; Richardson S; Best N
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18482997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.