These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1912270)

  • 1. The effect of screening on some pretest-posttest test variances.
    Follmann DA
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):763-71. PubMed ID: 1912270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some unexamined aspects of analysis of covariance in pretest-posttest studies.
    Ganju J
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):829-33. PubMed ID: 15339308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nutrition intervention group program based on preaction-stage-oriented change processes of the Transtheoretical Model promotes long-term reduction in dietary fat intake.
    Finckenor M; Byrd-Bredbenner C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Mar; 100(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 10719408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partial likelihood analysis of within-unit variances in repeated measurement experiments.
    Chinchilli VM; Esinhart JD; Miller WG
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 7766775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive designs with correlated test statistics.
    Götte H; Hommel G; Faldum A
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1429-44. PubMed ID: 19226563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors.
    Bellavance F; Tardif S; Stephens MA
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 8672705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for treatment effect in the presence of regression toward the mean.
    George V; Johnson WD; Shahane A; Nick TG
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 9147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal two-stage designs for clinical trials based on safety and efficacy.
    Thall PF; Cheng SC
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 11276033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample sizes in the multivariate analysis of repeated measurements.
    Vonesh EF; Schork MA
    Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):601-10. PubMed ID: 3567293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical methods study of the effects of triclosan dentifrices on gingivitis over six months.
    Winston JL; Bartizek RD; McClanahan SF; Mau MS; Beiswanger BB
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):240-8. PubMed ID: 12518498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the estimation of change from baseline in a continuous outcome measure in the clinical trial setting.
    Mayer-Hamblett N; Kronmal RA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 15837448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel design for estimating relative accuracy of screening tests when complete disease verification is not feasible.
    Alonzo TA; Kittelson JM
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):605-12. PubMed ID: 16918926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical aspects of fish vaccination trials.
    Jarp J; Tverdal A
    Dev Biol Stand; 1997; 90():311-20. PubMed ID: 9270859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group sequential tests for bivariate response: interim analyses of clinical trials with both efficacy and safety endpoints.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):741-52. PubMed ID: 8241370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust analysis of within-unit variances in repeated measurement experiments.
    Padmanabhan AR; Chinchilli VM; Babu GJ
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1520-6. PubMed ID: 9453785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model.
    Moerbeek M; Wong WK
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2850-64. PubMed ID: 17960589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.