These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Neuroscience Needs to Test Both Statistical and Scientific Hypotheses. Alger BE J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8432-8438. PubMed ID: 36351823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian analysis for nurse and midwifery research: statistical, practical and ethical benefits. Malone HE; Coyne I Nurse Res; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP. Kelter R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP. Quintana DS; Williams DR BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment. Szucs D; Ioannidis JPA Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():390. PubMed ID: 28824397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study. Stunt J; van Grootel L; Bouter L; Trafimow D; Hoekstra T; de Boer M PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258330. PubMed ID: 34653185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moving Beyond p < 0.05 in Ecotoxicology: A Guide for Practitioners. Erickson RA; Rattner BA Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1657-1669. PubMed ID: 32539165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters. Grzybowski A; Mianowany M Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology. Smith RJ Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing. Perezgonzalez JD Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing. Stang A; Poole C Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In support of null hypothesis significance testing. Mogie M Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Introduction to Calculating Bayes Factors in JASP for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Brydges CR; Gaeta L J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4523-4533. PubMed ID: 31830850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing. García-Pérez MA Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Aug; 77(4):631-662. PubMed ID: 30034024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moving college health research forward: Reconsidering our reliance on statistical significance testing. Barry AE; Valdez D; Goodson P; Szucs L; Reyes JV J Am Coll Health; 2019 Apr; 67(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29952723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing. Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers. Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility. Tijmstra J Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):548-559. PubMed ID: 29476482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]